» Articles » PMID: 36711289

Efficient Extraction of Small Microplastic Particles from Rat Feed and Feces for Quantification

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Jan 30
PMID 36711289
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To date, microplastic is ubiquitously encountered in the environment. Studies analyzing microplastic in terrestrial ecosystems, including animal feces and feed, are few. Microplastic quantification method validation and harmonization are not yet far developed. For the analysis of small microplastic, approximately <0.5 mm, extraction from organic and inorganic materials is fundamental prior to quantitative and qualitative analysis. Method validation, including recovery studies, are necessary throughout the analytical chain. In this study, we developed an optimized, efficient protocol with a duration of 72 h for the digestion of laboratory rat feed and feces. A combination of a mild acidic (HO 15%; HNO 5%) and an alkaline treatment (10% KOH) dissolving the previous filter, followed by enzymatic digestion (Viscozyme®L) proved to be efficient for the extraction and identification of spiked polyamide (15-20 μm) and polyethylene (40-48 μm) from feed and feces samples from rats, showing high recovery rates. Extracted rat feces samples from an study in which Wistar rats were fed with feed containing microplastic were analyzed with pyrolysis-gas chromatography-Orbitrap™ mass spectrometry, quantifying recovered microplastic in rat feces in environmentally relevant concentrations. The presented three-step protocol provides a suitable, time and cost-effective method to extract microplastic from rat feed and feces.

Citing Articles

Influence of selected dosages of plastic microparticles on the porcine fecal microbiome.

Galecka I, Rychlik A, Calka J Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1269.

PMID: 39779716 PMC: 11711237. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80337-x.


Using feces to indicate plastic pollution in terrestrial vertebrate species in western Thailand.

Teampanpong J, Duengkae P PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17596.

PMID: 38948236 PMC: 11212639. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17596.

References
1.
Lusher A, Munno K, Hermabessiere L, Carr S . Isolation and Extraction of Microplastics from Environmental Samples: An Evaluation of Practical Approaches and Recommendations for Further Harmonization. Appl Spectrosc. 2020; 74(9):1049-1065. DOI: 10.1177/0003702820938993. View

2.
Perez-Guevara F, Kutralam-Muniasamy G, Shruti V . Critical review on microplastics in fecal matter: Research progress, analytical methods and future outlook. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 778:146395. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146395. View

3.
Donohue M, Masura J, Gelatt T, Ream R, Baker J, Faulhaber K . Evaluating exposure of northern fur seals, Callorhinus ursinus, to microplastic pollution through fecal analysis. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019; 138:213-221. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.036. View

4.
von Friesen L, Granberg M, Hassellov M, Gabrielsen G, Magnusson K . An efficient and gentle enzymatic digestion protocol for the extraction of microplastics from bivalve tissue. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019; 142:129-134. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.03.016. View

5.
Liu S, Guo J, Liu X, Yang R, Wang H, Sun Y . Detection of various microplastics in placentas, meconium, infant feces, breastmilk and infant formula: A pilot prospective study. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 854:158699. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158699. View