» Articles » PMID: 36710359

Maternity Protection Entitlements for Non-standard Workers in Low-and-middle-income Countries and Potential Implications for Breastfeeding Practices: a Scoping Review of Research Since 2000

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Jan 30
PMID 36710359
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recommended breastfeeding practices contribute to improved health of infants, young children, and mothers. Access to comprehensive maternity protection would enable working women to breastfeed for longer. Women working in positions of non-standard employment are particularly vulnerable to not accessing maternity protection entitlements. The objective of this scoping review was to determine the current research conducted on maternity protection available and accessible to non-standard workers in low-and-middle-income countries and any potential implications for breastfeeding practices.

Methods: Nine databases were searched using search terms related to maternity protection, non-standard employment, and breastfeeding. Documents in English published between January 2000 and May 2021 were included. The approach recommended by the Joanna Briggs Institute was used to select sources, extract, and present data. The types of participants included in the research were female non-standard workers of child-bearing age. The core concept examined by the scoping review was the availability and access to comprehensive maternity protection entitlements of pregnant and breastfeeding women. Research from low-and-middle-income countries was included. The types of evidence sources were limited to primary research.

Results: Seventeen articles were included for data extraction mainly from research conducted in Africa and Asia. Research on maternity protection for non-standard workers mostly focused on childcare. Components of maternity protection are inconsistently available and often inaccessible to women working in non-standard employment. Inaccessibility of maternity protection was described to disrupt breastfeeding both directly and indirectly, but certain characteristics of non-standard work were found to be supportive of breastfeeding.

Conclusions: Published information on maternity protection for non-standard workers is limited. However, the available information indicates that non-standard workers have inadequate and inconsistent access to maternity protection rights. The expansion of comprehensive maternity protection to all women working in positions of non-standard employment could encourage significant social and economic benefits.

Citing Articles

Escaping the midway trap: A mixed method study highlighting roadblocks and coping mechanisms of female researchers in Cameroon.

Fouda Mbarga N, Tsinda S, Mamiafo C, Mbarga M, Tchachoua L, Ngo Likeng J PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(10):e0001759.

PMID: 39441814 PMC: 11498680. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001759.


Continued Breastfeeding in a Birth Cohort in the Western Amazon of Brazil: Risk of Interruption and Associated Factors.

Pastro D, Martins F, Ramalho A, Andrade A, Opitz S, Koifman R Nutrients. 2024; 16(19).

PMID: 39408375 PMC: 11478627. DOI: 10.3390/nu16193408.


The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Experiential Training Model on Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Healthcare Workers in Maternity Health Management: A Preliminary Study [Letter].

Ahmad M J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024; 17:3305-3306.

PMID: 39006870 PMC: 11246633. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S484718.


Complex intertwined association between breastfeeding practices and household food insecurity: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Buccini G, Larrison C, Neupane S, Palapa M, Schincaglia R, Brown S Matern Child Nutr. 2024; 20(4):e13696.

PMID: 38960401 PMC: 11574660. DOI: 10.1111/mcn.13696.


Mothers' Willingness to Use Workplace Lactation Supports: Evidence from Formally Employed Mothers in Central Kenya.

Ickes S, Lemein H, McKay A, Arensen K, Singa B, Kinyua J Curr Dev Nutr. 2023; 7(12):102032.

PMID: 38130332 PMC: 10733674. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102032.


References
1.
Scherer R, Saldanha I . How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches. Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1):264. PMC: 6836535. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1188-0. View

2.
Rollins N, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter C, Martines J . Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?. Lancet. 2016; 387(10017):491-504. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01044-2. View

3.
Peters M, Godfrey C, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares C . Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015; 13(3):141-6. DOI: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050. View

4.
Walters D, Phan L, Mathisen R . The cost of not breastfeeding: global results from a new tool. Health Policy Plan. 2019; 34(6):407-417. PMC: 6735804. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz050. View

5.
Siregar A, Pitriyan P, Hardiawan D, Zambrano P, Vilar-Compte M, Belismelis G . The yearly financing need of providing paid maternity leave in the informal sector in Indonesia. Int Breastfeed J. 2021; 16(1):17. PMC: 7885595. DOI: 10.1186/s13006-021-00363-7. View