» Articles » PMID: 36709464

Marriage and Childbirth of Patients Who Were Surgically and Non-surgically Treated for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a Survey at the Age of 30 years or Older

Overview
Journal Spine Deform
Publisher Springer Nature
Date 2023 Jan 29
PMID 36709464
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to investigate the marital status and childbirth in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

Methods: This study included women who were treated surgically or non-surgically for AIS with a scoliosis magnitude ≥ 30° before surgery or at skeletal maturity and were followed up until age 30 years or older. Patients were divided into surgically treated (S-AIS, n = 55) and non-surgically treated AIS groups (N-AIS, n = 86). Data from the national fertility survey were used as control values.

Results: There were no significant differences in age at the final follow-up between the S- (40.7 years) and N-AIS (42.1 years) groups. The unmarried rate among all women and the nulliparous rate among married women in the S-AIS group (29.1% and 18.4%, respectively) were similar to those in the N-AIS group (26.7% and 16.1%, respectively). The mean number of children per married woman also did not differ between the S- and N-AIS groups (1.5 vs 1.4). Compared to the control group, after adjusting for age, the common odds ratio in the AIS group was 1.56 (p = 0.031) for unmarried status and 1.88 (p = 0.026) for nulliparity among married women. Moreover, the mean number of children per married woman was significantly lower in the AIS group than in the control group (1.3 vs 1.7, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Surgically and non-surgically treated women with AIS had a similar status with regard to marriage and childbirth, while women with AIS were more likely to be unmarried and nulliparous and to have fewer children compared to the nationwide population.

Citing Articles

Impact of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis on maternal and obstetric outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Hevia E, Burgos J, Sanpera I, Garcia V, de Santos Moreno M, Mariscal G Eur Spine J. 2025; .

PMID: 39988611 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-08734-y.


From Rib Hump to Baby Hump-Common Questions of Patients Suffering from and Undergoing Treatment for Scoliosis-A Comprehensive Literature Review.

Grabala P, Kowalski P, Grabala M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999380 PMC: 11242321. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133814.


The impact of pregnancy on women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review.

Theroux J, Brown B, Marchese R, Selby M, Cope V, McAviney J Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023; 59(4):505-521.

PMID: 37746783 PMC: 10548399. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.08086-3.

References
1.
Konieczny M, Senyurt H, Krauspe R . Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 2014; 7(1):3-9. PMC: 3566258. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4. View

2.
Kino K, Fujiwara K, Fujishiro T, Nakaya Y, Hayama S, Yano T . Health-related quality of life, including marital and reproductive status, of middle-aged Japanese women with posterior spinal fusion using Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Longer than 22-year follow-up. J Orthop Sci. 2019; 25(5):820-824. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.11.007. View

3.
Falick-Michaeli T, Schroeder J, Barzilay Y, Luria M, Itzchayek E, Kaplan L . Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis and Pregnancy: An Unsolved Paradigm. Global Spine J. 2015; 5(3):179-84. PMC: 4472295. DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1552987. View

4.
Lange J, Steen H, Brox J . Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis. 2009; 4:17. PMC: 2743640. DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-4-17. View

5.
Orvomaa E, Hiilesmaa V, Poussa M, Snellman O, Tallroth K . Pregnancy and delivery in patients operated by the Harrington method for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 1997; 6(5):304-7. PMC: 3454608. DOI: 10.1007/BF01142675. View