Barriers and Facilitators to Return to Work Following Cardiovascular Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis of Qualitative Research

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Jan 27

PMID 36707117

Authors

Emma Borre Andersen

Maria Kristiansen

Sidsel Marie Bernt Jorgensen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: Return to work is a key rehabilitation goal, however, people recovering from cardiovascular disease (CVD) often struggle with returning to work. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-synthesis of the existing qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to return to work experienced by people with CVD.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and CINAHL in August 2022. The reference lists of the included articles were searched. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used for quality appraisal and a meta-synthesis was employed.

Findings: This review includes 15 studies of overall high methodological quality. Barriers covered four themes: physical limitations, psychological and relational factors, the working context and support within health and social care systems. Facilitators were related to five themes: return to normality, enhancing well-being, financial concerns, the working context and support within health and social care systems.

Conclusion: Our findings highlight that return to work following CVD is a complex process influenced by individual factors, as well as work-related factors, factors in the health and social care systems and social security policies and regulations. To improve return to work, this review illustrates a need for individualised, multidisciplinary and coordinated vocational rehabilitation programmes that accommodate potential barriers to re-employment. Similarly, this review highlights how vocational rehabilitation programmes should ensure individualised information and support early in the rehabilitation process, as well as the importance of engaging relevant stakeholders, such as employers, in making individualised return-to-work plans.

Citing Articles

Gender-Specific Insights into Depression in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: Findings from a Pilot Study Using a Self-Developed Questionnaire.

Bondar L, Osser B, Miuta C, Petran D, Baltean A, Butari D Diseases. 2024; 12(12.

PMID: 39727650 PMC: 11727549. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12120320.

Development of a standard set of key work-related outcomes for use in practice for patients with cardiovascular disease: a modified Delphi study.

Hagendijk M, Zipfel N, Hoving J, Melles M, van der Wees P, van der Burg-Vermeulen S J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024; 8(1):147.

PMID: 39692809 PMC: 11655757. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-024-00825-6.

Trajectory of health-related quality of life during and after hospitalisation due to worsening of heart failure.

Kuan W, Lim K, Chee K, Kasim S, Dujaili J, Lee K Qual Life Res. 2024; 34(2):471-484.

PMID: 39476200 PMC: 11865137. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03818-6.

Effects of a return to work program on the health and barriers to returning to work in head and neck cancer patients: A randomized controlled trial.

Chang Y, Huang B, Lin C, Chung C, Chen S Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023; 10(12):100320.

PMID: 38059206 PMC: 10696387. DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100320.

References

Tong A, Flemming K, Mcinnes E, Oliver S, Craig J . Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:181. PMC: 3552766. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181. View

Boot C, de Kruif A, Shaw W, van der Beek A, Deeg D, Abma T . Factors Important for Work Participation Among Older Workers with Depression, Cardiovascular Disease, and Osteoarthritis: A Mixed Method Study. J Occup Rehabil. 2015; 26(2):160-72. PMC: 4854935. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-015-9597-y. View

Finfgeld D . Metasynthesis: the state of the art--so far. Qual Health Res. 2003; 13(7):893-904. DOI: 10.1177/1049732303253462. View

OBrien L, Wallace S, Romero L . Effect of Psychosocial and Vocational Interventions on Return-to-Work Rates Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2017; 38(4):215-223. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000261. View

Van de Cauter J, De Bacquer D, Clays E, De Smedt D, Kotseva K, Braeckman L . Return to work and associations with psychosocial well-being and health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease patients: Results from EUROASPIRE IV. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019; 26(13):1386-1395. DOI: 10.1177/2047487319843079. View

Egholm C, Rossau H, Nilsen P, Bunkenborg G, Rod M, Doherty P . Implementation of a politically initiated national clinical guideline for cardiac rehabilitation in hospitals and municipalities in Denmark. Health Policy. 2018; 122(9):1043-1051. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.015. View

Reibis R, Salzwedel A, Abreu A, Corra U, Davos C, Doehner W . The importance of return to work: How to achieve optimal reintegration in ACS patients. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019; 26(13):1358-1369. DOI: 10.1177/2047487319839263. View

Roth G, Mensah G, Johnson C, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour L . Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76(25):2982-3021. PMC: 7755038. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010. View

Solano-Ruiz M, de Freitas G, Ugarte-Gurrutxaga M, Gomez-Cantarino S, Siles-Gonzalez J . Men's Positive and Negative Experiences Following Acute Myocardial Infarction. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(3). PMC: 7908433. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18031053. View

10.

Bosma A, Boot C, Snippen N, Schaafsma F, Anema J . Supporting employees with chronic conditions to stay at work: perspectives of occupational health professionals and organizational representatives. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):592. PMC: 7992826. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10633-y. View

11.

OHagan F . Work, organisational practices, and margin of manoeuver during work reintegration. Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 41(2):172-181. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1383520. View

12.

Pedersen S, Kruse M, Zwisler A, Helmark C, Pedersen S, Olsen K . Return to work: does cardiac rehabilitation make a difference? Danish nationwide register-based study. Scand J Public Health. 2021; 51(2):179-187. DOI: 10.1177/14034948211062656. View

13.

Rorth R, Wong C, Kragholm K, Fosbol E, Mogensen U, Lamberts M . Return to the Workforce After First Hospitalization for Heart Failure: A Danish Nationwide Cohort Study. Circulation. 2016; 134(14):999-1009. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.021859. View

14.

Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, Torbica A, Lettino M, Petersen S . European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2019. Eur Heart J. 2019; 41(1):12-85. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz859. View

15.

Warraich H, Kaltenbach L, Fonarow G, Peterson E, Wang T . Adverse Change in Employment Status After Acute Myocardial Infarction: Analysis From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018; 11(6):e004528. PMC: 6003623. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004528. View

16.

Slebus F, Jorstad H, Peters R, Kuijer P, Willems J, Sluiter J . Return to work after an acute coronary syndrome: patients' perspective. Saf Health Work. 2012; 3(2):117-22. PMC: 3440460. DOI: 10.5491/SHAW.2012.3.2.117. View

17.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

18.

OHagan F, Coutu M, Thomas S, Mertens D . Work reintegration and cardiovascular disease: medical and rehabilitation influences. J Occup Rehabil. 2011; 22(2):270-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-011-9345-x. View

19.

Hegewald J, Wegewitz U, Euler U, van Dijk J, Adams J, Fishta A . Interventions to support return to work for people with coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 3:CD010748. PMC: 6416827. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010748.pub2. View

20.

Bernt Jorgensen S, Johnsen N, Gerds T, Brondum S, Maribo T, Gislason G . Perceived return-to-work pressure following cardiovascular disease is associated with age, sex, and diagnosis: a nationwide combined survey- and register-based cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1059. PMC: 9135990. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13494-1. View