» Articles » PMID: 36704110

The Effect of Reciprocating and Rotary Systems on Postoperative Endodontic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the instrumentation kinematics on endodontic postoperative pain.

Methods And Materials: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Lilacs, Cochrane Library and the System for Information on Gray Literature in Europe were searched electronically without time or language limitations up to June 2020. Subsequently, data extraction, quality assessment and meta-analysis were conducted. The meta-analysis was performed using random-effects inverse-variance methods, and heterogeneity was tested using the index (<0.05).

Results: A total of 318 articles were successfully identified in the search. Sixteen studies were used in qualitative synthesis and fourteen used for quantitative synthesis. Meta-analysis showed that patients treated with reciprocating system had lower risk of pain 48 h after endodontic treatment (Risk ratio [RR]=1.04, 95% Confidence interval [CI]=1.01-1.06, =0.003) (I=0%), but the mean postoperative pain for the reciprocating system was greater 24 h post endodontic treatment (Standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.25, 95% CI=0.06 to 0.44, =0.01) (I=43%). Other time points presented similar rates of postoperative pain (>0.05). The certainty of evidence ranges from very low to high.

Conclusions: The rate of postoperative endodontic pain was low, and reciprocating systems evoked more pain within the 24 h interval. Overall, the incidence and level of postoperative pain did not vary between reciprocating and rotary systems. There is no consensus if there is a relationship between the kinematics (rotary and reciprocating) and the incidence of postoperative pain.

Citing Articles

Use of 2Shape® File in Adaptive Kinematics Influences Post-operative Pain After Single Visit Endodontics in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Double-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yarlagadda S, Prabakar K, Chandrasekaran S, Natanasabapathy V, Suresh N Eur Endod J. 2024; 9(4):432-440.

PMID: 39704627 PMC: 11685524. DOI: 10.14744/eej.2024.38980.


Postoperative Endodontic Pain after Treatment Using XP-endo Finisher: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Fernandes L, de Sousa Santos C, Ditzel Westphalen V, Silva Neto U, Carneiro E Iran Endod J. 2023; 18(3):145-151.

PMID: 37431528 PMC: 10329762. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v18i3.33925.


The Effect of Number of Visits, Use of Solvent and Gutta-percha Removal Technique on Postoperative Pain following Nonsurgical Endodontic Retreatment; A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Scardini I, Sarra G, Braga M, Dos Santos M, Freire L Iran Endod J. 2023; 18(2):71-84.

PMID: 37152852 PMC: 10155107. DOI: 10.22037/iej.v18i2.39945.

References
1.
Gambarini G, Testarelli L, De Luca M, Milana V, Plotino G, Grande N . The influence of three different instrumentation techniques on the incidence of postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2013; 4(1):152-5. PMC: 3671808. DOI: 10.11138/ads.0152. View

2.
Oliveira P, da Costa K, Carvalho C, Ferreira M . Impact of root canal preparation performed by ProTaper Next or Reciproc on the quality of life of patients: a randomized clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2018; 52(2):139-148. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12990. View

3.
Shokraneh A, Ajami M, Farhadi N, Hosseini M, Rohani B . Postoperative endodontic pain of three different instrumentation techniques in asymptomatic necrotic mandibular molars with periapical lesion: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 21(1):413-418. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1807-2. View

4.
Nagendrababu V, Gutmann J . Factors associated with postobturation pain following single-visit nonsurgical root canal treatment: 
A systematic review. Quintessence Int. 2016; 48(3):193-208. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a36894. View

5.
Krithikadatta J, Sekar V, Sudharsan P, Velumurugan N . Influence of three Ni-Ti cleaning and shaping files on postinstrumentation endodontic pain: A triple-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19(4):311-6. PMC: 4979275. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.186442. View