» Articles » PMID: 36701034

The Role of Implicit Social Bias on Holistic Processing of Out-group Faces

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Jan 26
PMID 36701034
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Although faces of in-group members are generally thought to be processed holistically, there are mixed findings on whether holistic processing remains robust for faces of out-group members and what factors contribute to holistic processing of out-group faces. This study examined how implicit social bias, experience with out-group members, and ability to process in-group faces holistically might predict the magnitude of holistic processing for faces of two out-groups: other-race and other-age groups. In Experiment 1, Caucasian participants viewed Caucasian (own-race) and East Asian (other-race) faces. In Experiment 2, young adult participants viewed young adult (own-age) and baby (other-age) faces. Each participant completed a composite task with in-group and out-group faces, an implicit association test, and questionnaires about their experience with in-group and out-group members. We found that while the participants had relatively extensive experience with the other-race group, they had limited experience with the other-age group. Nonetheless, implicit social bias was found to positively predict the magnitude of holistic processing for both other-race and other-age faces. Exploratory analyses on the interactions among the predictors suggest that the effect of implicit social bias was primarily observed in participants with strong holistic processing ability of in-group faces but with low level of experience with members of the out-groups. These findings suggest that observers utilize different kinds of information when processing out-group faces, and that social features, such as race or age, are incorporated to influence how out-group faces are processed efficiently.

Citing Articles

Implicit bias and experience influence overall but not relative trustworthiness judgment of other-race faces.

Cheung O, Quimpo N, Smoley J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16068.

PMID: 38992163 PMC: 11239880. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66705-7.

References
1.
Brysbaert M, New B . Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):977-90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977. View

2.
Hummert M, Garstka T, OBrien L, Greenwald A, Mellott D . Using the implicit association test to measure age differences in implicit social cognitions. Psychol Aging. 2002; 17(3):482-95. DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.17.3.482. View

3.
Lebrecht S, Pierce L, Tarr M, Tanaka J . Perceptual other-race training reduces implicit racial bias. PLoS One. 2009; 4(1):e4215. PMC: 2627769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004215. View

4.
Levin D . Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001; 129(4):559-74. DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.129.4.559. View

5.
Pelli D . The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat Vis. 1997; 10(4):437-42. View