» Articles » PMID: 36700932

Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas with and Without Total Keratometry and Ray Tracing in Patients with Previous Myopic SMILE

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2023 Jan 26
PMID 36700932
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the prediction error (PE) variance and absolute median PE of different intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas including last-generation formulas such as Barrett True-K with K, Okulix and total keratometry (TK)-based calculations with Haigis, and Barrett True-K in a simulation model in post-small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) eyes.

Settings: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

Design: Prospective study.

Methods: Preoperative measurements included IOL power calculation before and after SMILE surgery. The target refraction was set to be the lowest myopic refractive error in pre-SMILE eyes. The IOL power targeting at the lowest myopic refractive error in pre-SMILE eyes was selected for the post-SMILE IOL calculation of the same eye. The difference between the predicted refraction of pre- and post-SMILE eyes with the same IOL power was defined as IOL difference. The refractive change induced by SMILE was defined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction.

Results: 98 eyes from 49 patients underwent bilateral myopic SMILE. The PE variance of Okulix was not significantly different compared with Barrett True-K with TK ( P = .471). The SDs of the mean PEs were ±0.413 D (Haigis-TK), ±0.453 D (Okulix), ±0.471 D (Barrett True-K with TK), ±0.556 D (Haigis-L), and ±0.576 D (Barrett True-K with K). The mean absolute PE was 0.340 D, 0.353 D, 0.404 D, 0.511 D, and 0.715 D for Haigis-TK, Okulix, Barrett True-K with TK, Barrett True-K with K, and Haigis-L, respectively. The highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D was achieved by Okulix, followed by Haigis-TK, Barrett True-K with TK, Barrett True-K with K, and Haigis-L.

Conclusions: Results suggest that Haigis in combination with TK, Okulix, and Barrett True-K with and without TK offer good options for accurate IOL power calculation after SMILE. Haigis-L showed a tendency for myopic shift in eyes after previous SMILE.

Citing Articles

Changes in cataract and refractive surgery practice patterns among JSCRS members over the past 20 years.

Sato M, Kamiya K, Hayashi K, Tabuchi H, Kojima T, Goto N Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2024; 68(5):443-462.

PMID: 39002076 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-024-01081-3.


Intraocular lens power calculation using total keratometry and ray tracing in eyes with previous small incision lenticule extraction - A case series.

Lischke R, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M, Kreutzer T, Priglinger S, Dirisamer M Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2024; 34:102037.

PMID: 38487335 PMC: 10937105. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.102037.


Comparison of the accuracy of 9 intraocular lens power calculation formulas after SMILE in Chinese myopic eyes.

Li L, Yuan L, Yang K, Wu Y, Alafati S, Hua X Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20539.

PMID: 37996736 PMC: 10667341. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47990-0.


Accuracy of the FY-L formula in calculating intraocular lens power after small-incision lenticule extraction.

Hu Y, Lin L, Zeng D, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1241824.

PMID: 37692774 PMC: 10483841. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1241824.