Comparison of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas with and Without Total Keratometry and Ray Tracing in Patients with Previous Myopic SMILE
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To evaluate the prediction error (PE) variance and absolute median PE of different intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formulas including last-generation formulas such as Barrett True-K with K, Okulix and total keratometry (TK)-based calculations with Haigis, and Barrett True-K in a simulation model in post-small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) eyes.
Settings: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Design: Prospective study.
Methods: Preoperative measurements included IOL power calculation before and after SMILE surgery. The target refraction was set to be the lowest myopic refractive error in pre-SMILE eyes. The IOL power targeting at the lowest myopic refractive error in pre-SMILE eyes was selected for the post-SMILE IOL calculation of the same eye. The difference between the predicted refraction of pre- and post-SMILE eyes with the same IOL power was defined as IOL difference. The refractive change induced by SMILE was defined as the difference between preoperative and postoperative manifest refraction.
Results: 98 eyes from 49 patients underwent bilateral myopic SMILE. The PE variance of Okulix was not significantly different compared with Barrett True-K with TK ( P = .471). The SDs of the mean PEs were ±0.413 D (Haigis-TK), ±0.453 D (Okulix), ±0.471 D (Barrett True-K with TK), ±0.556 D (Haigis-L), and ±0.576 D (Barrett True-K with K). The mean absolute PE was 0.340 D, 0.353 D, 0.404 D, 0.511 D, and 0.715 D for Haigis-TK, Okulix, Barrett True-K with TK, Barrett True-K with K, and Haigis-L, respectively. The highest percentage of eyes within ±0.50 D was achieved by Okulix, followed by Haigis-TK, Barrett True-K with TK, Barrett True-K with K, and Haigis-L.
Conclusions: Results suggest that Haigis in combination with TK, Okulix, and Barrett True-K with and without TK offer good options for accurate IOL power calculation after SMILE. Haigis-L showed a tendency for myopic shift in eyes after previous SMILE.
Sato M, Kamiya K, Hayashi K, Tabuchi H, Kojima T, Goto N Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2024; 68(5):443-462.
PMID: 39002076 DOI: 10.1007/s10384-024-01081-3.
Lischke R, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M, Kreutzer T, Priglinger S, Dirisamer M Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2024; 34:102037.
PMID: 38487335 PMC: 10937105. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.102037.
Li L, Yuan L, Yang K, Wu Y, Alafati S, Hua X Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20539.
PMID: 37996736 PMC: 10667341. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47990-0.
Hu Y, Lin L, Zeng D, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1241824.
PMID: 37692774 PMC: 10483841. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1241824.