» Articles » PMID: 36700190

The Impact of Low-Density Lipoprotein Equation Changes on Cholesterol Treatment in Canada

Overview
Journal CJC Open
Date 2023 Jan 26
PMID 36700190
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In cardiovascular disease prevention, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values guide treatment for lowering cholesterol level. After 50 years of clinical laboratories using the Friedewald LDL-C equation, the Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists recently recommended adoption of the new and more accurate Sampson / U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) LDL-C equation. Here, we estimate the anticipated population-level impact of this equation change.

Methods: We compared lipid profiles from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) year 2019 to those from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) years 2017 to 2020. Then, based on 10,828 participants in the latter, we calculated the impact of changing the LDL-C equation from the Friedewald to the Sampson.

Results: Sampson- and Friedewald-equation LDL-C values are strongly correlated ( = 0.99, < 0.001), but differences between them increase with both higher triglyceride and lower LDL-C values. We evaluated the impact of these discordances using LDL-C treatment thresholds from the 2021 Canadian Cardiovascular Society lipid guidelines. Among patients who take cholesterol-lowering medications, the Sampson equation reclassifies 3.3% more patients (95% confidence interval 2.2% to 4.9%), or about 123,000 individuals, as meeting the criteria for treatment intensification.

Conclusion: Although changing the LDL-C equation used from the Friedewald to the Sampson affects only a small proportion of the population, an estimated 123,000 Canadians who are taking cholesterol-lowering medications may need to intensify treatment to lower their cholesterol level, due to small absolute changes around guideline threshold values of LDL-C.

Citing Articles

Accuracy and Clinical Impact of Estimating Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol at High and Low Levels by Different Equations.

Sampson M, Wolska A, Cole J, Zubiran R, Otvos J, Meeusen J Biomedicines. 2022; 10(12).

PMID: 36551912 PMC: 9776049. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10123156.

References
1.
Ginsberg H, Rosenson R, Hovingh G, Letierce A, Samuel R, Poulouin Y . LDL-C calculated by Friedewald, Martin-Hopkins, or NIH equation 2 versus beta-quantification: pooled alirocumab trials. J Lipid Res. 2021; 63(1):100148. PMC: 8953656. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlr.2021.100148. View

2.
Vujovic A, Kotur-Stevuljevic J, Spasic S, Bujisic N, Martinovic J, Vujovic M . Evaluation of different formulas for LDL-C calculation. Lipids Health Dis. 2010; 9:27. PMC: 2847568. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-27. View

3.
Chen Y, Zhang X, Pan B, Jin X, Yao H, Chen B . A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values. Lipids Health Dis. 2010; 9:52. PMC: 2890624. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-52. View

4.
Mendes de Cordova C, de Cordova M . A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort. Ann Clin Biochem. 2012; 50(Pt 1):13-9. DOI: 10.1258/acb.2012.011259. View

5.
Piani F, Cicero A, Ventura F, Dormi A, Fogacci F, Patrono D . Evaluation of twelve formulas for LDL-C estimation in a large, blinded, random Italian population. Int J Cardiol. 2021; 330:221-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.009. View