Assessment of Students' Satisfaction with Virtual Robotic Surgery Training

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2023 Jan 26

PMID 36699266

Authors

T Kalinov

T Georgiev

K Bliznakova

A Zlatarov

N Kolev

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Nowadays, in Bulgaria there is a trend of increasing entry into the surgical field of robot-assisted surgery operations, which suggests a need for the establishment of a large number of specialists in this field in a short period. Based on these arguments, the Medical University of Varna was the first university in the country to introduce a robotic surgery training program for medical students. The study aims to investigate the medical students' satisfaction on robotic surgery training provided at Medical University of Varna with da Vinci Skills Simulator.

Design: During the summer semester of the academic 2020/2021 and 2021/2022 years, a pilot training of robotic surgery was conducted with 5th year students in Medicine. Within one month, the students had the opportunity to get acquainted with the simulator of da Vinci Xi robotic system. The training was divided into two modules: a two-week theoretical module and a two-week practical module. After completing the training, students filled out a questionnaire dedicated to assess their satisfaction with the proposed training. Correlation between their responses and the objective parameters assessed on the simulator was calculated.

Results: Thirty participants (16 men and 14 women) shared their opinion on easiness of use and usefulness of the robotic simulator in training of surgery activities. Students' responses highly evaluated both aspects with average five-point Likert scale scores of 4.3 and 4.5, respectively. 93% of the participants would continue their further education and training in robotic surgery field. In addition, there was no correlation between objective evaluation by the simulator and students responses.

Conclusions: Training in robotic surgery proves to be a useful approach for training students to develop skills and profession in the field of surgery. The results suggest that training in this field may be accomplished even at the student level, by exploiting the robotic surgery in realistic scenario and thus, in a timely manner to find out the surgical direction they want to be further evolved.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Applications of Digital Technology in Undergraduate Surgical Education.

Quek F, Meldrum S, Hislop J Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77278.

PMID: 39801700 PMC: 11725316. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77278.

Integration of Virtual Reality in the Control System of an Innovative Medical Robot for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery.

Covaciu F, Crisan N, Vaida C, Andras I, Pusca A, Gherman B Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(12).

PMID: 37420568 PMC: 10301646. DOI: 10.3390/s23125400.

References

Farivar B, Flannagan M, Leitman I . General surgery residents' perception of robot-assisted procedures during surgical training. J Surg Educ. 2014; 72(2):235-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.09.008. View

Ismail A, Wood M, Ind T, Gul N, Moss E . The development of a robotic gynaecological surgery training curriculum and results of a delphi study. BMC Med Educ. 2020; 20(1):66. PMC: 7057472. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-1979-y. View

Abboudi H, Khan M, Aboumarzouk O, Guru K, Challacombe B, Dasgupta P . Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators - a systematic review. BJU Int. 2012; 111(2):194-205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11270.x. View

Lee J, Park H, Lee D, Song S, Yu J, Ryu J . From cadaveric and animal studies to the clinical reality of robotic mastectomy: a feasibility report of training program. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21032. PMC: 8548531. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00278-7. View

Akhtar K, Chen A, Standfield N, Gupte C . The role of simulation in developing surgical skills. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014; 7(2):155-60. PMC: 4092204. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-014-9209-z. View

Pedowitz R, Esch J, Snyder S . Evaluation of a virtual reality simulator for arthroscopy skills development. Arthroscopy. 2002; 18(6):E29. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.33791. View

Madan S, Pai D . Role of simulation in arthroscopy training. Simul Healthc. 2013; 9(2):127-35. DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182a86165. View

Moglia A, Morelli L, Ferrari V, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A . Distribution of innate psychomotor skills recognized as important for surgical specialization in unconditioned medical undergraduates. Surg Endosc. 2018; 32(10):4087-4095. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6146-8. View

Moit H, Dwyer A, De Sutter M, Heinzel S, Crawford D . A Standardized Robotic Training Curriculum in a General Surgery Program. JSLS. 2020; 23(4). PMC: 6924504. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00045. View

10.

Agha R, Fowler A . The role and validity of surgical simulation. Int Surg. 2015; 100(2):350-7. PMC: 4337453. DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00004.1. View

11.

Uemura M, Tomikawa M, Nagao Y, Yamashita N, Kumashiro R, Tsutsumi N . Significance of metacognitive skills in laparoscopic surgery assessed by essential task simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013; 23(3):165-72. DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2013.867273. View

12.

Fleming C, Ali O, Clements J, Hirniak J, King M, Mohan H . Surgical trainee experience and opinion of robotic surgery in surgical training and vision for the future: a snapshot study of pan-specialty surgical trainees. J Robot Surg. 2021; 16(5):1073-1082. PMC: 8616984. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01344-y. View

13.

Turner S, Mormando J, Park B, Huang J . Attitudes of robotic surgery educators and learners: challenges, advantages, tips and tricks of teaching and learning robotic surgery. J Robot Surg. 2019; 14(3):455-461. PMC: 8507581. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01013-1. View

14.

Bartlett J, Lawrence J, Yan M, Guevel B, Stewart M, Audenaert E . The learning curves of a validated virtual reality hip arthroscopy simulator. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 140(6):761-767. PMC: 7244605. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03352-3. View

15.

Moglia A, Sinceri S, Ferrari V, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Morelli L . Proficiency-based training of medical students using virtual simulators for laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery: results of a pilot study. Updates Surg. 2018; 70(3):401-405. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-018-0559-8. View

16.

Custura-Craciun D, Cochior D, Constantinoiu S, Neagu C . Surgical virtual reality - highlights in developing a high performance surgical haptic device. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2013; 108(6):757-63. View

17.

Stirling E, Lewis T, Ferran N . Surgical skills simulation in trauma and orthopaedic training. J Orthop Surg Res. 2014; 9:126. PMC: 4299292. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0126-z. View

18.

Tergas A, Sheth S, Green I, Giuntoli 2nd R, Winder A, Fader A . A pilot study of surgical training using a virtual robotic surgery simulator. JSLS. 2013; 17(2):219-26. PMC: 3771788. DOI: 10.4293/108680813X13654754535872. View

19.

Hart R, Doherty D, Karthigasu K, Garry R . The value of virtual reality-simulator training in the development of laparoscopic surgical skills. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006; 13(2):126-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.015. View

20.

Kyaw B, Saxena N, Posadzki P, Vseteckova J, Nikolaou C, George P . Virtual Reality for Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(1):e12959. PMC: 6362387. DOI: 10.2196/12959. View