Nationwide Bibliometric Analysis of Integrated Plastic Surgery Program Directors
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Methods: We identified plastic surgery programs based on 2021 Doximity reputation and research output rankings, respectively, and then divided them into four quartiles (Q1-Q4). PD academic history and bibliometric indices (h-index, the number of publications, and citations) were collected through Doximity profiles and program websites: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
Results: Eighty-four programs were identified. There was a significant positive relationship between h-index, the number of publications, and type of research with reputation ranking ( < 0.05). After adjusting for years of experience post-training, h-index (OR = 1.24; < 0.001) and the number of publications (OR = 1.05, < 0.001) were significantly associated with reputation ranking. There was a statistically significant relationship between PD research fellowship completion and research output ranking ( < 0.01). After adjusting for years of experience post-training, h-index (OR = 1.05; = 0.047) and the number of publications (OR = 1.01; = 0.04) were significantly associated with research output ranking.
Conclusion: Higher ranked programs tend to have PDs who have a strong record of scholarly activity, as evidenced by certain bibliometric indices.
Sobti N, Rhee B, Soliman L, Rao V, Kwan D, Woo A Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(2):e5595.
PMID: 38322810 PMC: 10846765. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005595.