» Articles » PMID: 36698876

Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Thrombectomy: Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Pseudo-occlusion Vs. True Occlusion

Overview
Journal Front Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jan 26
PMID 36698876
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: Pseudo-occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (cICA) refers to an absence of intraluminal contrast on computed tomography angiography (CTA), while the artery is patent on digital subtraction angiography during endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to compare the outcomes between the cICA pseudo-occlusion and true occlusion after thrombectomy.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with apparent cICA occlusion on CTA who underwent thrombectomy between January 2016 and August 2021, and divided them into the pseudo-occlusion and true occlusion groups based on angiographic exploration. Recanalization failure was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 0-2a. Poor outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6. Propensity score matching was performed to compare the outcomes. Sensitivity analysis using multivariate-adjusted regression in the original cohort was conducted to test the robustness of the findings.

Results: Of the 146 patients included, 79 patients (54.1%) had cICA pseudo-occlusion and 67 patients (45.9%) had true occlusion. Following 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis, patients with pseudo-occlusion had an increased likelihood of recanalization failure (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.06-9.59; = 0.040) and poor outcome (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.07-7.30; = 0.035) compared with patients with true occlusion. Sensitivity analysis showed that cICA pseudo-occlusion remained independently associated with recanalization failure (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.07-6.09; = 0.036) and poor outcome (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.08-5.67; = 0.032).

Conclusions: Patients with cICA pseudo-occlusion on CTA treated with thrombectomy had an increased risk of reperfusion failure and poor outcome compared with true occlusion patients.

Citing Articles

Outcome of acute ischemic stroke with absent opacification of the cervical internal carotid artery at CT-angiography after endovascular treatment.

Comai A, Casalboni C, Vingiani V, Bonatti M, Franchini E, DallOra E Neuroradiol J. 2025; :19714009251313504.

PMID: 39854219 PMC: 11760076. DOI: 10.1177/19714009251313504.


Endovascular Thrombectomy for Carotid Pseudo-Occlusion in the Setting of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Toruno M, Meier T, Elfil M, Varshika K, Cortese J, Ghozy S AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024; 45(9):1241-1245.

PMID: 38575320 PMC: 11392358. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8268.

References
1.
Duijsens H, Spaander F, van Dijk L, Treurniet F, Keunen R, Mosch A . Endovascular treatment in patients with acute ischemic stroke and apparent occlusion of the extracranial internal carotid artery on CTA. J Neurointerv Surg. 2014; 7(10):709-14. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011297. View

2.
Grossberg J, Haussen D, Cardoso F, Rebello L, Bouslama M, Anderson A . Cervical Carotid Pseudo-Occlusions and False Dissections: Intracranial Occlusions Masquerading as Extracranial Occlusions. Stroke. 2017; 48(3):774-777. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.015427. View

3.
Wareham J, Crossley R, Barr S, Mortimer A . Cervical ICA pseudo-occlusion on single phase CTA in patients with acute terminal ICA occlusion: what is the mechanism and can delayed CTA aid diagnosis?. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018; 10(10):983-987. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013708. View

4.
Goyal M, Orlov K, Jensen M, Taylor A, Majoie C, Jayaraman M . A DELPHI consensus statement on antiplatelet management for intracranial stenting due to underlying atherosclerosis in the setting of mechanical thrombectomy. Neuroradiology. 2020; 63(4):627-632. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-020-02556-z. View

5.
Akpinar S, Gelener P, Yilmaz G . Aetiologies of internal carotid artery pseudo-occlusions in acute stroke patients: what neurointerventionalists can expect. Br J Radiol. 2016; 90(1070):20160352. PMC: 5685129. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160352. View