» Articles » PMID: 36698393

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilar Compared with Reference Bevacizumab in Locally Advanced and Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jan 26
PMID 36698393
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab has played an important role in the systemic treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without gene mutation. In recent years, bevacizumab biosimilar has received marketing approval based on the results of phase III clinical studies. However, more clinical data are needed to verify the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar in clinical application.

Materials And Methods: We identified 946 patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who were treated with bevacizumab biosimilar or bevacizumab from January 1, 2019 to November 30, 2021. Comparisons and statistical analyses of bevacizumab biosimilar and bevacizumab were made in terms of efficacy and safety. Efficacy evaluation was performed directly in accordance with RECIST v1.1. Adverse events were graded following the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0.

Results: The objective response rates (ORRs) were 28.9% in the biosimilar group (n=551) and 30.9% in the reference group (n=395; unstratified ORR risk ratio: 0.934, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.677-1.138; unstratified ORR risk difference: -0.020, 95% CI: -0.118-0.035). The estimated median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 6.27 (95% CI: 5.53-7.01) and 4.93 (95% CI: 4.24-5.62) months in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (=0.296). The number of treatment lines, combined treatment regimens and with or without radiotherapy were significant factors affecting the PFS of both groups (<0.001, =0.001, =0.039). Different genetic mutations and dose intensity were not the main factors affecting PFS (=0.627, =0.946). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 76.41% in the biosimilar group and 71.65% in the reference group (=0.098). The incidences of grade 3 or higher TEAEs were 22.14% and 19.49% in the biosimilar and reference groups, respectively (=0.324).

Conclusions: Bevacizumab biosimilar is equivalent in efficacy to bevacizumab in patients with locally advanced and advanced NSCLC. It showed acceptable toxicity profile and no new adverse events. Patients who were excluded by clinical trials can also benefit from bevacizumab biosimilar.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Biosimilar (Encoda) Compared With Reference Bevacizumab (Avastin) in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Real-World Study.

Shan H, Wang M, Huang S, Liu H, Liu J, Du Q Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2024; 18:11795549241303726.

PMID: 39669102 PMC: 11635854. DOI: 10.1177/11795549241303726.


Retrospective analysis of survival and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar and original drug combination chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Zhang X, Chu X, Wang J, Gu W, Fu X, Zhang J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1437762.

PMID: 39474107 PMC: 11518682. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1437762.


Evaluation of bevacizumab biosimilar on wound healing complications in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis in anorectal medicine.

Li Y, Mei Z, Shi L, Wan Y, Zhou X, Zeng T Int Wound J. 2024; 21(1):e14638.

PMID: 38272807 PMC: 10805537. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14638.


Clinical Benefit, Price, and Uptake for Cancer Biosimilars vs Reference Drugs in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Luo X, Du X, Li Z, Liu J, Lv X, Li H JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(10):e2337348.

PMID: 37824143 PMC: 10570888. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37348.


and in mediating different hemorrhage outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer after bevacizumab treatment.

Huang L, Yin Y, Qian D, Cao Y, Wang D, Wu X J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(4):2022-2036.

PMID: 37197507 PMC: 10183489. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-23-389.

References
1.
Saleem T, Qurashi H, Jamali M, Gomez J, Kanderi T . Biosimilars as a Future, Promising Solution for Financial Toxicity: A Review with Emphasis on Bevacizumab. Cureus. 2020; 12(7):e9300. PMC: 7437115. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9300. View

2.
Yang J . Bevacizumab in EGFR-positive NSCLC: time to change first-line treatment?. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 20(5):602-603. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30085-3. View

3.
Lee S, Jeong D, Han Y, Baek M . Pivotal role of vascular endothelial growth factor pathway in tumor angiogenesis. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2015; 89(1):1-8. PMC: 4481026. DOI: 10.4174/astr.2015.89.1.1. View

4.
Cohen M, Gootenberg J, Keegan P, Pazdur R . FDA drug approval summary: bevacizumab (Avastin) plus Carboplatin and Paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced/metastatic recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2007; 12(6):713-8. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-6-713. View

5.
Endrenyi L, Markus R . Interchangeability Of Biological Drug Products-FDA Draft Guidance. J Biopharm Stat. 2019; 29(6):1003-1010. DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1607369. View