» Articles » PMID: 36698384

Degraded Bone Microarchitecture in Women with PHPT-Significant Predictor of Fracture Probability

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) experience bone mineral density (BMD) loss and trabecular bone score (TBS) alteration, which current guidelines recommend assessing. Considering TBS alongside BMD for a 10-year fracture risk assessment (FRAX) may improve PHPT management.

Design: Retrospective, cross-sectional study composed of 49 Caucasian females (62 ± 10.6 years, 27.7 ± 0.87 kg/m) with PHPT and 132 matched control subjects (61.3 ± 10.5 years, 27.5 ± 0.49 kg/m) evaluated in 3 years. We assessed lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD, T and Z scores (GE Healthcare Lunar Osteodensitometer) and TBS (iNsight 1.8), major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and hip FRAX.

Results: Patients with PHPT had statistically lower mean values for lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm,  = .01), LS T-scores (-2 ± 0.2 vs -1.4 ± 0.1 SD,  = .009), LS Z scores (-0.9 ± 0.19 vs -0.1 ± 0.11 SD,  = .009), femoral neck bone mineral density (FN BMD) (0.79 ± 0.02 vs 0.83 ± 0.01 g/cm,  = .02), FN T-scores (-1.8 ± 0.13 vs -1.5 ± 0.07 SD,  = .017), FN Z scores (-0.51 ± 0.87 vs -0.1 ± 0.82 SD,  = .006), and TBS (0.95 ± 0.25 vs 1.01 ± 0.14 g/cm,  = .01) compared with control subjects. 22.4% of patients with PHPT had degraded microarchitecture (TBS < 1.2) vs. 7.6% in control group (χ = 0.008). PHPT proved to be a covariate with unique contribution ( = .031) alongside LS BMD ( = .040) in a linear regression model [  = 0.532,  = 4.543] for TBS < 1.2. TBS adjustment elevated MOF FRAX both for PHPT (4.35  ± 0.6% vs 5.25% ± 0.73%,  < .001) and control groups (4.5  ± 0.24% vs 4.7% ± 0.26%,  < .001) compared with BMD-bases FRAX, but also increased differently between the 2 study groups (1.1-folds for PHPT patients and 1.04 for control subjects,  = .034).

Conclusion: Compared with control, TBS-adjusted FRAX provides significantly higher MOF risk than BMD-based FRAX in PHPT women.

References
1.
Bonaccorsi G, Cafarelli F, Cervellati C, De Guio F, Greco P, Giganti M . A new corrective model to evaluate TBS in obese post-menopausal women: a cross-sectional study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019; 32(7):1303-1308. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01317-0. View

2.
Dhainaut A, Hoff M, Syversen U, Haugeberg G . Technologies for assessment of bone reflecting bone strength and bone mineral density in elderly women: an update. Womens Health (Lond). 2016; 12(2):209-16. PMC: 5375053. DOI: 10.2217/whe.15.94. View

3.
Jones A, Simons K, Harvey S, Grill V . Bone Mineral Density Compared to Trabecular Bone Score in Primary Hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(2). PMC: 8781599. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11020330. View

4.
Camacho P, Petak S, Binkley N, Diab D, Eldeiry L, Farooki A . AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGISTS/AMERICAN COLLEGE OF ENDOCRINOLOGY CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS-2020 UPDATE. Endocr Pract. 2020; 26(Suppl 1):1-46. DOI: 10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL. View

5.
Pothuaud L, Carceller P, Hans D . Correlations between grey-level variations in 2D projection images (TBS) and 3D microarchitecture: applications in the study of human trabecular bone microarchitecture. Bone. 2008; 42(4):775-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.018. View