» Articles » PMID: 36693103

Hemodynamic Transient and Functional Connectivity Follow Structural Connectivity and Cell Type over the Brain Hierarchy

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Jan 24
PMID 36693103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The neural circuit of the brain is organized as a hierarchy of functional units with wide-ranging connections that support information flow and functional connectivity. Studies using MRI indicate a moderate coupling between structural and functional connectivity at the system level. However, how do connections of different directions (feedforward and feedback) and regions with different excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) neurons shape the hemodynamic activity and functional connectivity over the hierarchy are unknown. Here, we used functional MRI to detect optogenetic-evoked and resting-state activities over a somatosensory pathway in the mouse brain in relation to axonal projection and E/I distribution. Using a highly sensitive ultrafast imaging, we identified extensive activation in regions up to the third order of axonal projections following optogenetic excitation of the ventral posteriomedial nucleus of the thalamus. The evoked response and functional connectivity correlated with feedforward projections more than feedback projections and weakened with the hierarchy. The hemodynamic response exhibited regional and hierarchical differences, with slower and more variable responses in high-order areas and bipolar response predominantly in the contralateral cortex. Electrophysiological recordings suggest that these reflect differences in neural activity rather than neurovascular coupling. Importantly, the positive and negative parts of the hemodynamic response correlated with E/I neuronal densities, respectively. Furthermore, resting-state functional connectivity was more associated with E/I distribution, whereas stimulus-evoked effective connectivity followed structural wiring. These findings indicate that the structure-function relationship is projection-, cell-type- and hierarchy-dependent. Hemodynamic transients could reflect E/I activity and the increased complexity of hierarchical processing.

Citing Articles

Elucidating hemodynamics and neuro-glio-vascular signaling using rodent fMRI.

Zhou X, Jiang Y, Gomez-Cid L, Yu X Trends Neurosci. 2025; 48(3):227-241.

PMID: 39843335 PMC: 11903151. DOI: 10.1016/j.tins.2024.12.010.


Evolution of aberrant brain-wide spatiotemporal dynamics of resting-state networks in a Huntington's disease mouse model.

Vasilkovska T, Verschuuren M, Pustina D, van den Berg M, Van Audekerke J, Pintelon I Clin Transl Med. 2024; 14(10):e70055.

PMID: 39422700 PMC: 11488302. DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.70055.


Magnetogenetic stimulation inside MRI induces spontaneous and evoked changes in neural circuits activity in rats.

Chuang K, Qian C, Gilad A, Pelled G Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1459120.

PMID: 39411150 PMC: 11473493. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1459120.


Probing hippocampal stimulation in experimental temporal lobe epilepsy with functional MRI.

Schwaderlapp N, Paschen E, Levan P, von Elverfeldt D, Haas C Front Neuroimaging. 2024; 3:1423770.

PMID: 39205946 PMC: 11349577. DOI: 10.3389/fnimg.2024.1423770.


The Effects of Locus Coeruleus Optogenetic Stimulation on Global Spatiotemporal Patterns in Rats.

Anumba N, Kelberman M, Pan W, Marriott A, Zhang X, Xu N bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38826205 PMC: 11142206. DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.23.595327.


References
1.
Vazquez A, Cohen E, Gulani V, Hernandez-Garcia L, Zheng Y, Lee G . Vascular dynamics and BOLD fMRI: CBF level effects and analysis considerations. Neuroimage. 2006; 32(4):1642-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.195. View

2.
Yu X, Qian C, Chen D, Dodd S, Koretsky A . Deciphering laminar-specific neural inputs with line-scanning fMRI. Nat Methods. 2013; 11(1):55-8. PMC: 4276040. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2730. View

3.
Pelled G, Bergstrom D, Tierney P, Conroy R, Chuang K, Yu D . Ipsilateral cortical fMRI responses after peripheral nerve damage in rats reflect increased interneuron activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(33):14114-9. PMC: 2720851. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903153106. View

4.
Fornito A, Arnatkeviciute A, Fulcher B . Bridging the Gap between Connectome and Transcriptome. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018; 23(1):34-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.005. View

5.
Nunes D, Ianus A, Shemesh N . Layer-specific connectivity revealed by diffusion-weighted functional MRI in the rat thalamocortical pathway. Neuroimage. 2018; 184:646-657. PMC: 6264401. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.050. View