» Articles » PMID: 36692605

Post-hepatectomy Biliary Leaks: Analysis of Risk Factors and Development of a Simplified Predictive Scoring System

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Jan 24
PMID 36692605
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Most studies identifying risk factors for post-hepatectomy biliary leaks (PHBLs) have relatively small proportions of major hepatectomies. A simplified predictive score to identify high risk patients is necessary in order to investigate the efficacy of mitigation strategies.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of liver resections from a high-volume cancer center was performed. Multivariate regression was utilized for identification of risk factors and development of the predictive score.

Results: A total of 862 patients underwent a curative hepatic resection over 10 years, of whom 146 (16.9%) developed a biliary leak; 85 (9.86%), 52 (6.03%), and 9 (1.04%) patients had a grade A, B, and C leak respectively. A biliary-enteric anastomosis [OR 5.1 (95% CI 2.45-10.58); p < 0.001], a central [OR 4.33 (95% CI 1.25-14.95); p = 0.021] or an extended hepatectomy [OR 4.29 (95% CI 1.52-12.12); p = 0.006], liver steatosis [OR 2.28 (95% CI 1.09-4.77); p = 0.027], and blood loss of ≥ 2000 mL [OR 2.219 (95% CI 1.15-4.27); p = 0.017] were identified as independent predictors of a clinically significant biliary leak and were assigned 1 point each to develop the biliary leak score. Clinically significant biliary leaks were seen in 11 (2.79%), 20 (6.38%), 19 (15.4%), 9 (56.3%), and 1 (100%) patients with scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: A biliary-enteric anastomosis, a central or extended hepatectomy, liver steatosis, and blood loss ≥ 2L combined result in a simple predictive score for clinically significant biliary leaks.

Citing Articles

Impact of post-hepatectomy biliary leaks on long-term survival in different liver tumors: A single institute experience.

Ballal D, Patkar S, Kunte A, Sundaram S, Shetty N, Gala K Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024; 28(4):451-457.

PMID: 39013882 PMC: 11599820. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-078.

References
1.
Martin A, Narayanan S, Turrentine F, Bauer T, Adams R, Stukenborg G . Clinical Factors and Postoperative Impact of Bile Leak After Liver Resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017; 22(4):661-667. PMC: 5871550. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3650-4. View

2.
Capussotti L, Ferrero A, Vigano L, Sgotto E, Muratore A, Polastri R . Bile leakage and liver resection: Where is the risk?. Arch Surg. 2006; 141(7):690-4. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.141.7.690. View

3.
Zimmitti G, Roses R, Andreou A, Shindoh J, Curley S, Aloia T . Greater complexity of liver surgery is not associated with an increased incidence of liver-related complications except for bile leak: an experience with 2,628 consecutive resections. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012; 17(1):57-64. PMC: 3855461. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-012-2000-9. View

4.
Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, Masui H, Endo I, Sekido H . Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg. 2003; 27(6):695-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-003-6907-x. View

5.
Yoshioka R, Saiura A, Koga R, Seki M, Kishi Y, Yamamoto J . Predictive factors for bile leakage after hepatectomy: analysis of 505 consecutive patients. World J Surg. 2011; 35(8):1898-903. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1114-7. View