A Quantitative Approach to the Intersectional Study of Mental Health Inequalities During the COVID-19 Pandemic in UK Young Adults

Overview

Journal Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

Specialties Psychiatry
Public Health
Social Sciences

Date 2023 Jan 24

PMID 36692519

Authors

Dario Moreno-Agostino

Charlotte Woodhead

George B Ploubidis

Jayati Das-Munshi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Mental health inequalities across social identities/positions during the COVID-19 pandemic have been mostly reported independently from each other or in a limited way (e.g., at the intersection between age and sex or gender). We aim to provide an inclusive socio-demographic mapping of different mental health measures in the population using quantitative methods that are consistent with an intersectional perspective.

Methods: Data included 8,588 participants from two British cohorts (born in 1990 and 2000-2002, respectively), collected in February/March 2021 (during the third UK nationwide lockdown). Measures of anxiety and depressive symptomatology, loneliness, and life satisfaction were analysed using Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA) models.

Results: We found evidence of large mental health inequalities across intersectional strata. Large proportions of those inequalities were accounted for by the additive effects of the variables used to define the intersections, with some of the largest gaps associated with sexual orientation (with sexual minority groups showing substantially worse outcomes). Additional inequalities were found by cohort/generation, birth sex, racial/ethnic groups, and socioeconomic position. Intersectional effects were observed mostly in intersections defined by combinations of privileged and marginalised social identities/positions (e.g., lower-than-expected life satisfaction in South Asian men in their thirties from a sexual minority and a disadvantaged childhood social class).

Conclusion: We found substantial inequalities largely cutting across intersectional strata defined by multiple co-constituting social identities/positions. The large gaps found by sexual orientation extend the existing evidence that sexual minority groups were disproportionately affected by the pandemic. Study implications and limitations are discussed.

Citing Articles

Intersectional inequalities in mental health by education, income, gender, and age before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands: a longitudinal study.

Verra S, Evans C, Groeniger J, de Wit J, Poelman M, Kamphuis C Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):250.

PMID: 39587583 PMC: 11590372. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02338-6.

Identifying disparities in mental illness and well-being across no-risk, risk, and intersectional groups during the Covid-19 pandemic and the role of sociodemographics in mental health outcomes.

Fernandes C, Netos F, Neto F, Costa P Braz J Psychiatry. 2024; 46:e20233532.

PMID: 38696738 PMC: 11744262. DOI: 10.47626/1516-4446-2023-3532.

Intersectional discrimination and mental health inequalities: a qualitative study of young women's experiences in Scotland.

Tinner L, Alonso Curbelo A Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):45.

PMID: 38424534 PMC: 10903064. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02133-3.

Theorising the social in mental health research and action: a call for more inclusivity and accountability.

Bemme D, Behague D Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024; 59(3):403-408.

PMID: 38407626 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-024-02632-2.

Socioeconomic conditions and children's mental health and quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic: An intersectional analysis.

Lorthe E, Richard V, Dumont R, Loizeau A, Perez-Saez J, Baysson H SSM Popul Health. 2023; 23:101472.

PMID: 37560087 PMC: 10407575. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101472.

References

Evans C . Modeling the intersectionality of processes in the social production of health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 226:249-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.017. View

Hatzenbuehler M, Phelan J, Link B . Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am J Public Health. 2013; 103(5):813-21. PMC: 3682466. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301069. View

Link B, Garcia S . Diversions: How the Underrepresentation of Research on Advantaged Groups Leaves Explanations for Health Inequalities Incomplete. J Health Soc Behav. 2021; 62(3):334-349. DOI: 10.1177/00221465211028152. View

Link B, Phelan J . Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease. J Health Soc Behav. 1995; Spec No:80-94. View

McLeod J . Why and how inequality matters. J Health Soc Behav. 2015; 56(2):149-65. DOI: 10.1177/0022146515581619. View

Bauer G, Scheim A . Methods for analytic intercategorical intersectionality in quantitative research: Discrimination as a mediator of health inequalities. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 226:236-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.015. View

Bauer G . Incorporating intersectionality theory into population health research methodology: challenges and the potential to advance health equity. Soc Sci Med. 2014; 110:10-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.022. View

Evans C, Williams D, Onnela J, Subramanian S . A multilevel approach to modeling health inequalities at the intersection of multiple social identities. Soc Sci Med. 2017; 203:64-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.011. View

Bauer G, Churchill S, Mahendran M, Walwyn C, Lizotte D, Villa-Rueda A . Intersectionality in quantitative research: A systematic review of its emergence and applications of theory and methods. SSM Popul Health. 2021; 14:100798. PMC: 8095182. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100798. View

10.

Bauer G, Scheim A . Advancing quantitative intersectionality research methods: Intracategorical and intercategorical approaches to shared and differential constructs. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 226:260-262. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.018. View

11.

Evans C . Adding interactions to models of intersectional health inequalities: Comparing multilevel and conventional methods. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 221:95-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.036. View

12.

Evans C, Leckie G, Merlo J . Multilevel versus single-level regression for the analysis of multilevel information: The case of quantitative intersectional analysis. Soc Sci Med. 2019; 245:112499. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112499. View

13.

Merlo J . Multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) within an intersectional framework. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 203:74-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.026. View

14.

Evans C, Erickson N . Intersectionality and depression in adolescence and early adulthood: A MAIHDA analysis of the national longitudinal study of adolescent to adult health, 1995-2008. Soc Sci Med. 2018; 220:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.10.019. View

15.

Glymour M, Rudolph K . Causal inference challenges in social epidemiology: Bias, specificity, and imagination. Soc Sci Med. 2016; 166:258-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.045. View

16.

Bu F, Steptoe A, Fancourt D . Who is lonely in lockdown? Cross-cohort analyses of predictors of loneliness before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health. 2020; 186:31-34. PMC: 7405905. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.036. View

17.

Creese B, Khan Z, Henley W, ODwyer S, Corbett A, Vasconcelos Da Silva M . Loneliness, physical activity, and mental health during COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of depression and anxiety in adults over the age of 50 between 2015 and 2020. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020; 33(5):505-514. PMC: 7985900. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610220004135. View

18.

Creswell C, Shum A, Pearcey S, Skripkauskaite S, Patalay P, Waite P . Young people's mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2021; 5(8):535-537. PMC: 9765398. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00177-2. View

19.

Ellwardt L, Prag P . Heterogeneous mental health development during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):15958. PMC: 8342469. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-95490-w. View

20.

Moreno-Agostino D, Fisher H, Hatch S, Morgan C, Ploubidis G, Das-Munshi J . Generational, sex, and socioeconomic inequalities in mental and social wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: prospective longitudinal observational study of five UK cohorts. Psychol Med. 2022; 53(13):6403-6414. PMC: 9874037. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291722003348. View