» Articles » PMID: 36689034

Comparison of Survival Rates Between Incident Hemodialysis Patients and Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: a 5-year Prospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2023 Jan 23
PMID 36689034
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effect of dialytic modality at the start of renal replacement therapy on prognosis is controversial.

Methods: This multicenter, prospective cohort study included patients undergoing incident hemodialysis (HD) (n = 646) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) (n = 72). We excluded patients who lacked complete data for 3 months. One-to-one propensity score (PS) matching was performed before between-group comparison of survival rates (Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test) and identification of factors affecting prognosis (Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis).

Results: We enrolled 621 and 71 patients undergoing HD and PD, respectively (overall mean ± standard deviation age: 74 ± 13 years); 20% had cardiovascular disease (CVD). The median follow-up period was 41 (interquartile range 24-66) months. Following PS matching, we analyzed 65 patients undergoing HD and PD each. The 5-year overall survival rates did not differ between the groups (P = 0.97). The PD group exhibited a better CVD-related survival rate (P = 0.03). PD yielded adjusted hazard ratios for all-cause and CVD-related mortality of 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.99, P = 0.97) and 3.92 (95% CI 1.05-14.7, P = 0.04), respectively. Age (P < 0.001) and the use of a central venous catheter (CVC) at dialytic initiation (P = 0.02) were independent risks for all-cause mortality; whereas, only the use of a CVC (P = 0.01) was an independent risk for CVD-related mortality.

Conclusion: Although no differences were observed in overall survival, CVD-related survival may be better with dialytic initiation with PD than with HD.

Citing Articles

Chronic kidney disease.

Romagnani P, Agarwal R, Chan J, Levin A, Kalyesubula R, Karam S Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025; 11(1):8.

PMID: 39885176 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00589-9.


Interpretable machine learning models for the prediction of all-cause mortality and time to death in hemodialysis patients.

Chen M, Zeng Y, Liu M, Li Z, Wu J, Tian X Ther Apher Dial. 2024; 29(2):220-232.

PMID: 39327762 PMC: 11879476. DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.14212.


Chest X-ray Findings and Prognostic Factors in Survival Analysis in Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Patients: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Tabakoglu N, Hatipoglu O Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(8).

PMID: 39202612 PMC: 11356292. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60081331.


Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.

Ethier I, Hayat A, Pei J, Hawley C, Johnson D, Francis R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 6:CD013800.

PMID: 38899545 PMC: 11187793. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013800.pub2.

References
1.
Bello A, Okpechi I, Osman M, Cho Y, Htay H, Jha V . Epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022; 18(6):378-395. PMC: 8862002. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00542-7. View

2.
McDonald S, Marshall M, Johnson D, Polkinghorne K . Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008; 20(1):155-63. PMC: 2615722. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2007111188. View

3.
Kam-Tao Li P, Chow K . Peritoneal dialysis-first policy made successful: perspectives and actions. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013; 62(5):993-1005. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.038. View

4.
Termorshuizen F, Korevaar J, Dekker F, van Manen J, Boeschoten E, Krediet R . Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality rates according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003; 14(11):2851-60. DOI: 10.1097/01.asn.0000091585.45723.9e. View

5.
Robinson B, Akizawa T, Jager K, Kerr P, Saran R, Pisoni R . Factors affecting outcomes in patients reaching end-stage kidney disease worldwide: differences in access to renal replacement therapy, modality use, and haemodialysis practices. Lancet. 2016; 388(10041):294-306. PMC: 6563337. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30448-2. View