» Articles » PMID: 36688971

Ultralow-dose [F]FDG PET/CT Imaging: Demonstration of Feasibility in Dynamic and Static Images

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Jan 23
PMID 36688971
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Validation of [F]FDG PET/CT at ultralow-dose (0.37 MBq/kg) and compared to imaging at half-dose (1.85 MBq/kg).

Methods: This prospective head-to-head intraindividual study compared dynamic and static parameters of ultralow-dose with half-dose [F]FDG total-body PET/CT. In static imaging, the ultralow-dose groups of PET images were denoted ULD5, 60-65 min; ULD8, 60-68 min; ULD10, 60-70 min; and ULD15, 60-75 min. The half-dose group images were reconstructed to 60-61, 60-62, 60-63, and 60-75 min, defined as LD1, LD2, LD3, and LD15, respectively. A 5-point Likert scale was used to subjectively evaluate the quality of static PET images, with a score greater than 3 considered to meet the requirements for clinical diagnosis.

Results: Thirty participants were included in this study, and in terms of kinetic indicators, no special differences were found between the two groups of normal organs and lesions. In static images, those in groups ULD8 and LD2 achieved scores of [Formula: see text] 3.0, meeting the requirements for clinical diagnosis. In static imaging, four lesions were missed in the LD1 group with a lesion detectability of 89.7% (35/39). In the meantime, lesions were not missed in the whole ultra-low dose group (ULD5, ULD8, ULD10, and ULD15) and half-dose groups (LD2 and LD3).

Conclusions: Compared with half-dose imaging, ultralow-dose [F]FDG total-body PET/CT imaging is clinically feasible, and there was no meaningful difference between the two groups of quantitative and qualitative analysis either dynamic or static images. Total-body PET/CT with ultralow-dose activity, the corresponding acquisition time of 8 min provides acceptable image quality and lesion detection.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2000036487 KEY POINTS: • A prospective single-center study showed that the total-body PET scanner allows ultralow-dose [F]FDG imaging with acceptable image quality and lesion detectability. • For the participant, radiation exposure can be reduced with ultralow-dose [F]FDG total-body PET/CT imaging.

Citing Articles

Impact of deep learning denoising on kinetic modelling for low-dose dynamic PET: application to single- and dual-tracer imaging protocols.

Muller F, Li E, Daube-Witherspoon M, Pantel A, Wiers C, Dubroff J Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025; .

PMID: 40069458 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-025-07182-6.


The impact of long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET on oncologic imaging.

Cook G, Alberts I, Wagner T, Fischer B, Nazir M, Lilburn D Eur J Radiol. 2024; 183:111873.

PMID: 39647272 PMC: 11904125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111873.


Expert consensus on workflow of PET/CT with long axial field-of-view.

Liu G, Gu Y, Sollini M, Lazar A, Besson F, Li S Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 52(3):1038-1049.

PMID: 39520515 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06968-4.


Low dose optimization for total-body 2-[F]FDG PET/CT imaging: a single-center study on feasibility based on body mass index stratification.

Gu T, Liu S, Hou X, Zhao L, Ng Y, Wang J Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39214892 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11039-1.


Establishment and Application of a Radiation Dose Rate Model for Nuclear Medicine Examinees.

Hu Y, He X, Zhao W, Ding L, You M, Li Z China CDC Wkly. 2024; 6(23):553-557.

PMID: 38933663 PMC: 11196872. DOI: 10.46234/ccdcw2024.108.


References
1.
Svirydenka H, Muehlematter U, Nagel H, Delso G, Ferraro D, Kudura K . Ga-PSMA-11 dose reduction for dedicated pelvic imaging with simultaneous PET/MR using TOF BSREM reconstructions. Eur Radiol. 2020; 30(6):3188-3197. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06667-2. View

2.
Cherry S . The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of mice and men (and positrons)--advances in PET imaging technology. J Nucl Med. 2006; 47(11):1735-45. View

3.
Cherry S, Jones T, Karp J, Qi J, Moses W, Badawi R . Total-Body PET: Maximizing Sensitivity to Create New Opportunities for Clinical Research and Patient Care. J Nucl Med. 2017; 59(1):3-12. PMC: 5750522. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.116.184028. View

4.
Badawi R, Shi H, Hu P, Chen S, Xu T, Price P . First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET Scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019; 60(3):299-303. PMC: 6424228. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.226498. View

5.
Alberts I, Hunermund J, Prenosil G, Mingels C, Bohn K, Viscione M . Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(8):2395-2404. PMC: 8241747. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05282-7. View