» Articles » PMID: 36685882

Prognostic Prediction of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on Lipid Metabolism-related LncRNA Risk Coefficient Model

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2023 Jan 23
PMID 36685882
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to predict the prognosis in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) so as to understand cancer lipid metabolism and sensitivity to immune-targeting drugs, model algorithms were used to establish a risk coefficient model of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) associated with lipid metabolism. The transcriptome data were retrieved from TCGA, and lncRNAs associated with lipid metabolism were obtained through Pearson correlation and differential expression analyses. Differentially expressed lipid metabolism-related lncRNAs and lipid metabolism-related lncRNA pairs were obtained using the R language software. The minimum absolute shrinkage method and the selector operation regression method were used to construct the model and draw the receiver operator characteristic curve. High-risk patients were differentiated from low-risk patients through the cut-off value, and the correlation analyses of the high-risk subgroup and low-risk subgroup were performed. This research discovered that 25 pairs of lncRNAs were associated with the lipid metabolism of ccRCC, and 12 of these pairs were utilized to build the model. In combination with clinical data, the areas under the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival curves of ccRCC patients were 0.809, 0.764 and 0.792, separately. The cut-off value was used to perform subgroup analysis. The results showed that high-risk patients had poor prognosis. The results of Cox multivariate regressive analyses revealed that age and risk score were independent prediction factors of ccRCC prognosis. In addition, immune cell infiltration, the levels of gene expression at immune checkpoints, and high-risk patients more susceptible to sunitinib-targeted treatment were assessed by the risk model. Our team identified new prognostic markers of ccRCC and established risk models that could assess the prognosis of ccRCC patients and help determine which type of patients were more susceptible to sunitinib. These discoveries are vital for the optimization of risk stratification and personalized management.

Citing Articles

Exploring novel biomarkers and immunotherapeutic targets for biofeedback therapies to reveal the tumor-associated immune microenvironment through a multimetric analysis of kidney renal clear cell carcinoma.

Wang G, Huang J, Chen H, Jiang C, Jiang L, Feng W Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):311.

PMID: 40080320 PMC: 11906931. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-02090-5.


Recent Advances in the Management of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Novel Biomarkers and Targeted Therapies.

Schiavoni V, Campagna R, Pozzi V, Cecati M, Milanese G, Sartini D Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(12).

PMID: 37370817 PMC: 10296504. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15123207.

References
1.
Turco F, Tucci M, Di Stefano R, Samuelly A, Bungaro M, Audisio M . Renal cell carcinoma (RCC): fatter is better? A review on the role of obesity in RCC. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2021; 28(7):R207-R216. DOI: 10.1530/ERC-20-0457. View

2.
Lu Y, He X, Fang X, Chai N, Xu F . A novel lipid metabolism-related lncRNA signature predictive of clinical prognosis in cervical cancer. Front Genet. 2022; 13:1001347. PMC: 9621320. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1001347. View

3.
Zhou Y, Sun W, Qin Z, Guo S, Kang Y, Zeng S . LncRNA regulation: New frontiers in epigenetic solutions to drug chemoresistance. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020; 189:114228. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114228. View

4.
Ritchie M, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law C, Shi W . limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(7):e47. PMC: 4402510. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. View

5.
Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha V, Mukherjee S, Ebert B, Gillette M . Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(43):15545-50. PMC: 1239896. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102. View