» Articles » PMID: 36684355

"Semicut" Skill on the Cystic Duct in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Jan 23
PMID 36684355
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to decrease the incidence of residual stones in the cystic duct and consequently decrease the incidences of intractable pain and the formation of a small gallbladder after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). We changed the order of the clamps when performing LC, used the "semicut" skill of the cystic duct, and removed the stones residing in the cystic duct. A total of 45 patients underwent the operation, and all operations were completed successfully. This technique did not increase the operation time or difficulty. In conclusion, the "semicut" skill of the cystic duct is a safe and feasible surgical method that may change the occurrence of intractable pain after LC.

References
1.
Grossman J, Johnston W, Fowler K, Williams G, Hammill C, Hawkins W . A diagnosis reconsidered: the symptomatic gallbladder remnant. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2019; 26(4):137-143. PMC: 6461396. DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.613. View

2.
Yang X, Xu A, Li J, Xu Y, Xu D, Fu C . Dilation of the cystic duct confluence in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction in patients with secondary choledocholithiasis. BMC Surg. 2020; 20(1):50. PMC: 7079474. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00705-y. View

3.
Demetriades H, Pramateftakis M, Kanellos I, Angelopoulos S, Mantzoros I, Betsis D . Retained gallbladder remnant after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008; 18(2):276-9. DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.0210. View

4.
Chowbey P, Sharma A, Goswami A, Afaque Y, Najma K, Baijal M . Residual gallbladder stones after cholecystectomy: A literature review. J Minim Access Surg. 2015; 11(4):223-30. PMC: 4640007. DOI: 10.4103/0972-9941.158156. View

5.
Mahmud S, Hamza Y, Nassar A . The significance of cystic duct stones encountered during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001; 15(5):460-2. DOI: 10.1007/s004640000375. View