» Articles » PMID: 36684131

Robot-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Vs. Sternotomy for Thymectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2023 Jan 23
PMID 36684131
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Surgeons have widely regarded sternotomy (ST) as the standard surgical method for thymectomy. Minimally invasive methods for thymectomy, including video-assisted and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), have been explored. There are some studies have researched and compared the outcomes of patients after robotic and sternotomy procedure.

Methods: We searched the databases of Pubmed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and selected the studies on the efficacy and safety of RATS or ST for thymectomy. Meta-analysis was performed for operation time, operation blood loss, postoperative drainage time, operative complications and hospitalization time.

Results: A total of 16 cohort studies with 1,089 patients were included. Compared to ST, RATS is an appropriate alternative for thymectomy which reduced operation blood loss [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.82, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): (-2.64, -0.99),  = 0.000], postoperative drainage time [SMD = -2.47, 95% Cl: (-3.45, -1.48),  = 0.000], operative complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.31, 95% Cl: (0.18, 0.51),  = 0.000] and hospitalization time [SMD = -1.62, 95% Cl: (-2.16, -1.07),  = 0.000].

Conclusions: This meta-analysis based on cohort studies shows that RATS has more advantages over ST. Therefore, RATS is a more advanced and suitable surgical method for thymectomy.

Citing Articles

Robotic Versus Sternotomy, Thoracotomy and Video-Thoracoscopy Approaches for Thymoma Resection: A Comparative Analysis of Short-Term Results.

Trabalza Marinucci B, Tiracorrendo M, Vanni C, Messa F, Piccioni G, Siciliani A J Pers Med. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39852226 PMC: 11767127. DOI: 10.3390/jpm15010034.


Surgical treatment of thymic epithelial tumor and myasthenia gravis.

Ozcibik Isik G, Turna A Front Surg. 2024; 11:1467789.

PMID: 39624461 PMC: 11609204. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1467789.


Descriptive analysis of therapeutic outcomes between thoracoscopic and transsternal thymectomy in myasthenia gravis patients from 2011 to 2021.

Lashkarizadeh M, Haghollahi V, Nezhad N, Lashkarizadeh M, Shahpar A J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 19(1):510.

PMID: 39227955 PMC: 11370290. DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02983-6.


Subxiphoid Single-Port Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System versus VATS: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective, and Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Lee J, Hwang J, Park T, Gu B, Jung Y, Yi E Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(16).

PMID: 39199627 PMC: 11353098. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16162856.

References
1.
Liu T, Lin M, Hsieh M, Kao M, Chen K, Chang C . Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical thymectomy to treat early thymoma: a comparison with the conventional transsternal approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 21(1):322-8. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3228-7. View

2.
Ye B, Li W, Ge X, Feng J, Ji C, Cheng M . Surgical treatment of early-stage thymomas: robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus transsternal thymectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013; 28(1):122-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3137-7. View

3.
Marulli G, Rea F, Melfi F, Schmid T, Ismail M, Fanucchi O . Robot-aided thoracoscopic thymectomy for early-stage thymoma: a multicenter European study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144(5):1125-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.082. View

4.
Melfi F, Fanucchi O, Davini F, Viti A, Lucchi M, Ambrogi M . Ten-year experience of mediastinal robotic surgery in a single referral centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 41(4):847-51. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr112. View

5.
Luzzi L, Corzani R, Ghisalberti M, Meniconi F, De Leonibus L, Molinaro F . Robotic surgery vs. open surgery for thymectomy, a retrospective case-match study. J Robot Surg. 2020; 15(3):375-379. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01109-z. View