Functional Engineering Strategies of 3D Printed Implants for Hard Tissue Replacement

Overview

Journal Regen Biomater

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2023 Jan 23

PMID 36683758

Authors

Cen Chen

Bo Huang

Yi Liu

Fan Liu

In-Seop Lee

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Three-dimensional printing technology with the rapid development of printing materials are widely recognized as a promising way to fabricate bioartificial bone tissues. In consideration of the disadvantages of bone substitutes, including poor mechanical properties, lack of vascularization and insufficient osteointegration, functional modification strategies can provide multiple functions and desired characteristics of printing materials, enhance their physicochemical and biological properties in bone tissue engineering. Thus, this review focuses on the advances of functional engineering strategies for 3D printed biomaterials in hard tissue replacement. It is structured as introducing 3D printing technologies, properties of printing materials (metals, ceramics and polymers) and typical functional engineering strategies utilized in the application of bone, cartilage and joint regeneration.

Citing Articles

3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness.

Wang X, Mu M, Yan J, Han B, Ye R, Guo G Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae066.

PMID: 39169972 PMC: 11338467. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae066.

Multifunctional surface of the nano-morphic PEEK implant with enhanced angiogenic, osteogenic and antibacterial properties.

Zhang J, Ma T, Liu X, Zhang X, Meng W, Wu J Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae067.

PMID: 38974666 PMC: 11226884. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae067.

Replace or Regenerate? Diverse Approaches to Biomaterials for Treating Corneal Lesions.

Bonato P, Bagno A Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(4).

PMID: 38667213 PMC: 11047895. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9040202.

Fused Deposition Modeling Printed PLA/Nano β-TCP Composite Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffolds for Promoting Osteogenic Induction Function.

Wang W, Liu P, Zhang B, Gui X, Pei X, Song P Int J Nanomedicine. 2023; 18:5815-5830.

PMID: 37869064 PMC: 10590137. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S416098.

Enhancing cell adhesive and antibacterial activities of glass-fibre-reinforced polyetherketoneketone through Mg and Ag PIII.

Tan X, Wang Z, Yang X, Yu P, Sun M, Zhao Y Regen Biomater. 2023; 10:rbad066.

PMID: 37489146 PMC: 10363026. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbad066.

References

Cui Y, Jin R, Zhou Y, Yu M, Ling Y, Wang L . Crystallization enhanced thermal-sensitive hydrogels of PCL-PEG-PCL triblock copolymer for 3D printing. Biomed Mater. 2020; 16(3). DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/abc38e. View

Barabaschi G, Manoharan V, Li Q, Bertassoni L . Engineering Pre-vascularized Scaffolds for Bone Regeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2015; 881:79-94. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-22345-2_5. View

Tian P, Xu D, Liu X . Mussel-inspired functionalization of PEO/PCL composite coating on a biodegradable AZ31 magnesium alloy. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016; 141:327-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.02.004. View

Sun X, Tyagi P, Agate S, McCord M, Lucia L, Pal L . Highly tunable bioadhesion and optics of 3D printable PNIPAm/cellulose nanofibrils hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym. 2020; 234:115898. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115898. View

Kesti M, Muller M, Becher J, Schnabelrauch M, DEste M, Eglin D . A versatile bioink for three-dimensional printing of cellular scaffolds based on thermally and photo-triggered tandem gelation. Acta Biomater. 2014; 11:162-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.033. View

Nayar S, Bhuminathan S, Bhat W . Rapid prototyping and stereolithography in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015; 7(Suppl 1):S216-9. PMC: 4439675. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.155913. View

Luo C, Wang C, Wu X, Xie X, Wang C, Zhao C . Influence of porous tantalum scaffold pore size on osteogenesis and osteointegration: A comprehensive study based on 3D-printing technology. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021; 129:112382. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2021.112382. View

Chen Y, Li W, Zhang C, Wu Z, Liu J . Recent Developments of Biomaterials for Additive Manufacturing of Bone Scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020; 9(23):e2000724. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202000724. View

Siddiqui N, Asawa S, Birru B, Baadhe R, Rao S . PCL-Based Composite Scaffold Matrices for Tissue Engineering Applications. Mol Biotechnol. 2018; 60(7):506-532. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-018-0084-5. View

10.

Fousova M, Vojtech D, Doubrava K, Daniel M, Lin C . Influence of Inherent Surface and Internal Defects on Mechanical Properties of Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Alloy: Comparison between Selective Laser Melting and Electron Beam Melting. Materials (Basel). 2018; 11(4). PMC: 5951421. DOI: 10.3390/ma11040537. View

11.

Holzapfel B, Rudert M, Hutmacher D . [Scaffold-based Bone Tissue Engineering]. Orthopade. 2017; 46(8):701-710. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-017-3444-0. View

12.

Lu T, Wen J, Qian S, Cao H, Ning C, Pan X . Enhanced osteointegration on tantalum-implanted polyetheretherketone surface with bone-like elastic modulus. Biomaterials. 2015; 51:173-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.02.018. View

13.

Li B, Wang L, Xu F, Gang X, Demirci U, Wei D . Hydrosoluble, UV-crosslinkable and injectable chitosan for patterned cell-laden microgel and rapid transdermal curing hydrogel in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2015; 22:59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.04.026. View

14.

Zhang D, Xu X, Long X, Cheng K, Li J . Advances in biomolecule inspired polymeric material decorated interfaces for biological applications. Biomater Sci. 2019; 7(10):3984-3999. DOI: 10.1039/c9bm00746f. View

15.

Zhao Z, Gao W, Bai H . A mineral layer as an effective binder to achieve strong bonding between a hydrogel and a solid titanium substrate. J Mater Chem B. 2020; 6(23):3859-3864. DOI: 10.1039/c8tb01042k. View

16.

Cui H, Zhu W, Nowicki M, Zhou X, Khademhosseini A, Zhang L . Hierarchical Fabrication of Engineered Vascularized Bone Biphasic Constructs via Dual 3D Bioprinting: Integrating Regional Bioactive Factors into Architectural Design. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016; 5(17):2174-81. PMC: 5014673. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201600505. View

17.

Wang Z, Abdulla R, Parker B, Samanipour R, Ghosh S, Kim K . A simple and high-resolution stereolithography-based 3D bioprinting system using visible light crosslinkable bioinks. Biofabrication. 2015; 7(4):045009. DOI: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045009. View

18.

Gorecka Z, Idaszek J, Kolbuk D, Choinska E, Chlanda A, Swieszkowski W . The effect of diameter of fibre on formation of hydrogen bonds and mechanical properties of 3D-printed PCL. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020; 114:111072. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2020.111072. View

19.

Puleo D, Nanci A . Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(23-24):2311-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(99)00160-x. View

20.

Amin Yavari S, Ahmadi S, van der Stok J, Wauthle R, Riemslag A, Janssen M . Effects of bio-functionalizing surface treatments on the mechanical behavior of open porous titanium biomaterials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 36:109-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.04.010. View