» Articles » PMID: 36683757

Advances in 3D Skin Bioprinting for Wound Healing and Disease Modeling

Overview
Journal Regen Biomater
Date 2023 Jan 23
PMID 36683757
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Even with many advances in design strategies over the past three decades, an enormous gap remains between existing tissue engineering skin and natural skin. Currently available skin models still cannot replicate the three-dimensionality and heterogeneity of the dermal microenvironment sufficiently to recapitulate many of the known characteristics of skin disorder or disease . Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting enables precise control over multiple compositions, spatial distributions and architectural complexity, therefore offering hope for filling the gap of structure and function between natural and artificial skin. Our understanding of wound healing process and skin disease would thus be boosted by the development of models that could more completely capture the heterogeneous features of skin biology. Here, we provide an overview of recent advances in 3D skin bioprinting, as well as design concepts of cells and bioinks suitable for the bioprinting process. We focus on the applications of this technology for engineering physiological or pathological skin model, focusing more specifically on the function of skin appendages and vasculature. We conclude with current challenges and the technical perspective for further development of 3D skin bioprinting.

Citing Articles

Advancements in bioengineered and autologous skin grafting techniques for skin reconstruction: a comprehensive review.

Dean J, Hoch C, Wollenberg B, Navidzadeh J, Maheta B, Mandava A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 12():1461328.

PMID: 39840132 PMC: 11747595. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1461328.


3D Printing in Wound Healing: Innovations, Applications, and Future Directions.

Sachdeo R, Khanwelkar C, Shete A Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75331.

PMID: 39776700 PMC: 11706447. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75331.


Unveiling the impact of hypodermis on gene expression for advancing bioprinted full-thickness 3D skin models.

Avelino T, Harb S, Adamoski D, Oliveira L, Horinouchi C, Azevedo R Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1437.

PMID: 39528562 PMC: 11555214. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07106-4.


A Comparative Review of Meshed Versus Unmeshed Grafts in Split-Thickness Skin Grafting: Clinical Implications and Outcomes.

Samuel J, Gharde P, Surya D, Durge S, Gopalan V Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e69606.

PMID: 39429304 PMC: 11486679. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.69606.


Silver Nanoparticles in 3D Printing: A New Frontier in Wound Healing.

Astaneh M, Fereydouni N ACS Omega. 2024; 9(40):41107-41129.

PMID: 39398164 PMC: 11465465. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c04961.


References
1.
Ning L, Gil C, Hwang B, Theus A, Perez L, Tomov M . Biomechanical factors in three-dimensional tissue bioprinting. Appl Phys Rev. 2021; 7(4):041319. PMC: 7780402. DOI: 10.1063/5.0023206. View

2.
Nuutila K, Samandari M, Endo Y, Zhang Y, Quint J, Schmidt T . printing of growth factor-eluting adhesive scaffolds improves wound healing. Bioact Mater. 2021; 8:296-308. PMC: 8427093. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.030. View

3.
Hakimi N, Cheng R, Leng L, Sotoudehfar M, Ba P, Bakhtyar N . Handheld skin printer: in situ formation of planar biomaterials and tissues. Lab Chip. 2018; 18(10):1440-1451. PMC: 5965293. DOI: 10.1039/c7lc01236e. View

4.
Dzobo K, Motaung K, Adesida A . Recent Trends in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks for 3D Printing: An Updated Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20(18). PMC: 6788195. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20184628. View

5.
Li K, Jain P, He C, Eun F, Kang S, Tumbar T . Skin vasculature and hair follicle cross-talking associated with stem cell activation and tissue homeostasis. Elife. 2019; 8. PMC: 6684267. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45977. View