Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Overground Robotic Training Versus Conventional Locomotor Training in People with Spinal Cord Injury

Overview

Journal J Neuroeng Rehabil

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties Biomedical Engineering
Neurology
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2023 Jan 21

PMID 36681852

Authors

Daniel Pinto

Allen W Heinemann

Shuo-Hsiu Chang

Susan Charlifue

Edelle C Field-Fote

Catherine L Furbish

Arun Jayaraman

Candace Tefertiller

Heather B Taylor

Dustin D French

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Few, if any estimates of cost-effectiveness for locomotor training strategies following spinal cord injury (SCI) are available. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of locomotor training strategies following spinal cord injury (overground robotic locomotor training versus conventional locomotor training) by injury status (complete versus incomplete) using a practice-based cohort.

Methods: A probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a prospective, practice-based cohort from four participating Spinal Cord Injury Model System sites. Conventional locomotor training strategies (conventional training) were compared to overground robotic locomotor training (overground robotic training). Conventional locomotor training included treadmill-based training with body weight support, overground training, and stationary robotic systems. The outcome measures included the calculation of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) using the EQ-5D and therapy costs. We estimate cost-effectiveness using the incremental cost utility ratio and present results on the cost-effectiveness plane and on cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.

Results: Participants in the prospective, practice-based cohort with complete EQ-5D data (n = 99) qualified for the analysis. Both conventional training and overground robotic training experienced an improvement in QALYs. Only people with incomplete SCI improved with conventional locomotor training, 0.045 (SD 0.28), and only people with complete SCI improved with overground robotic training, 0.097 (SD 0.20). Costs were lower for conventional training, $1758 (SD $1697) versus overground robotic training $3952 (SD $3989), and lower for those with incomplete versus complete injury. Conventional overground training was more effective and cost less than robotic therapy for people with incomplete SCI. Overground robotic training was more effective and cost more than conventional training for people with complete SCI. The incremental cost utility ratio for overground robotic training for people with complete spinal cord injury was $12,353/QALY.

Conclusions: The most cost-effective locomotor training strategy for people with SCI differed based on injury completeness. Conventional training was more cost-effective than overground robotic training for people with incomplete SCI. Overground robotic training was more cost-effective than conventional training for people with complete SCI. The effect estimates may be subject to limitations associated with small sample sizes and practice-based evidence methodology. These estimates provide a baseline for future research.

Citing Articles

Remote Extended Reality with Markerless Motion Tracking for Sitting Posture Training.

Ai X, Agrawal S IEEE Robot Autom Lett. 2025; 9(11):9860-9867.

PMID: 39744590 PMC: 11687359. DOI: 10.1109/lra.2024.3460412.

Characterizing the Effects of Adding Virtual and Augmented Reality in Robot-Assisted Training.

Ai X, Santamaria V, Agrawal S IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2024; 32():2709-2718.

PMID: 39042524 PMC: 11324333. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3432661.

Economic analysis of digital motor rehabilitation technologies: a systematic review.

Agbemanyole K, Agbohessou K, Pons C, Lenca P, Remy-Neris O, Le Goff-Pronost M Health Econ Rev. 2024; 14(1):52.

PMID: 39014103 PMC: 11253330. DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00523-5.

A Protocol for Comprehensive Analysis of Gait in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury.

Butler Forslund E, Truong M, Wang R, Seiger A, Gutierrez-Farewik E Methods Protoc. 2024; 7(3).

PMID: 38804333 PMC: 11130903. DOI: 10.3390/mps7030039.

Economic Cost of Rehabilitation with Robotic and Virtual Reality Systems in People with Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review.

Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, Blazquez-Fernandez A, Marcos-Anton S, Sanchez-Herrera-Baeza P, Fernandez-Gonzalez P, Collado-Vazquez S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541755 PMC: 10971291. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061531.

References

Morrison S, Pomeranz J, Yu N, Schmidt Read M, Sisto S, Behrman A . Life care planning projections for individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury before and after locomotor training intervention: a case series. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012; 36(3):144-53. DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e318262e5ab. View

Miller L, Herbert W . Health and economic benefits of physical activity for patients with spinal cord injury. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2016; 8:551-558. PMC: 5055119. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S115103. View

Karelis A, Carvalho L, Castillo M, Gagnon D, Aubertin-Leheudre M . Effect on body composition and bone mineral density of walking with a robotic exoskeleton in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2016; 49(1):84-87. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2173. View

Avancena A, Prosser L . Innovations in cost-effectiveness analysis that advance equity can expand its use in health policy. BMJ Glob Health. 2022; 7(2). PMC: 8852660. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008140. View

Glick H, Briggs A, Polsky D . Quantifying stochastic uncertainty and presenting results of cost-effectiveness analyses. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2009; 1(1):25-36. DOI: 10.1586/14737167.1.1.25. View

Mulhern B, Feng Y, Shah K, Janssen M, Herdman M, van Hout B . Comparing the UK EQ-5D-3L and English EQ-5D-5L Value Sets. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018; 36(6):699-713. PMC: 5954043. DOI: 10.1007/s40273-018-0628-3. View

Cahill A, Ginley O, Bertrand C, Lennon O . Gym-based exoskeleton walking: A preliminary exploration of non-ambulatory end-user perspectives. Disabil Health J. 2018; 11(3):478-485. DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.01.004. View

Heinemann A, Kinnett-Hopkins D, Mummidisetty C, Bond R, Ehrlich-Jones L, Furbish C . Appraisals of robotic locomotor exoskeletons for gait: focus group insights from potential users with spinal cord injuries. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020; 15(7):762-772. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1745910. View

Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, De Bekker-Grob E, Briggs A, Carswell C . Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations. Value Health. 2022; 25(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351. View

10.

Kinnett-Hopkins D, Mummidisetty C, Ehrlich-Jones L, Crown D, Bond R, Applebaum M . Users with spinal cord injury experience of robotic Locomotor exoskeletons: a qualitative study of the benefits, limitations, and recommendations. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):124. PMC: 7488437. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-00752-9. View

11.

Neumann P, Cohen J, Weinstein M . Updating cost-effectiveness--the curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(9):796-7. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1405158. View

12.

Chun A, Asselin P, Knezevic S, Kornfeld S, Bauman W, Korsten M . Changes in bowel function following exoskeletal-assisted walking in persons with spinal cord injury: an observational pilot study. Spinal Cord. 2019; 58(4):459-466. PMC: 7145720. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-019-0392-z. View

13.

Lakdawalla D, Doshi J, Garrison Jr L, Phelps C, Basu A, Danzon P . Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3]. Value Health. 2018; 21(2):131-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.007. View

14.

Sorenson C, Drummond M, Bhuiyan Khan B . Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: disentangling the relationship. Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013; 5:223-34. PMC: 3686328. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S39634. View

15.

Willan A . Incremental net benefit in the analysis of economic data from clinical trials, with application to the CADET-Hp trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 16(6):543-9. DOI: 10.1097/00042737-200406000-00006. View

16.

Dittuno P, Ditunno Jr J, Dittuno Jr J . Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision. Spinal Cord. 2002; 39(12):654-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101223. View

17.

Devlin N, Shah K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B . Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2017; 27(1):7-22. PMC: 6680214. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3564. View

18.

Drummond M, Banta D . Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009; 25 Suppl 1:178-81. DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309090618. View

19.

Garnier-Villarreal M, Pinto D, Mummidisetty C, Jayaraman A, Tefertiller C, Charlifue S . Predicting Duration of Outpatient Physical Therapy Episodes for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury Based on Locomotor Training Strategy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; 103(4):665-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.815. View

20.

Shackleton C, Evans R, Shamley D, West S, Albertus Y . Effectiveness of over-ground robotic locomotor training in improving walking performance, cardiovascular demands, secondary complications and user-satisfaction in individuals with spinal cord injuries: A systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2019; 51(10):723-733. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2601. View