» Articles » PMID: 36681188

Fusion Gene Detection in Prostate Cancer Samples Enhances the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes from Radical Prostatectomy Through Machine Learning in a Multi-Institutional Analysis

Overview
Journal Am J Pathol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pathology
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36681188
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer remains one of the most fatal malignancies in men in the United States. Predicting the course of prostate cancer is challenging given that only a fraction of prostate cancer patients experience cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy. This study examined the expressions of 14 fusion genes in 607 prostate cancer samples from the University of Pittsburgh, Stanford University, and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The profiling of 14 fusion genes was integrated with Gleason score of the primary prostate cancer and serum prostate-specific antigen level to develop machine-learning models to predict the recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Machine-learning algorithms were developed by analysis of the data from the University of Pittsburgh cohort as a training set using the leave-one-out cross-validation method. These algorithms were then applied to the data set from the combined Stanford/Wisconsin cohort (testing set). The results showed that the addition of fusion gene profiling consistently improved the prediction accuracy rate of prostate cancer recurrence by Gleason score, serum prostate-specific antigen level, or a combination of both. These improvements occurred in both the training and testing cohorts and were corroborated by multiple models.

Citing Articles

Serum Fusion Transcripts to Assess the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and the Impact of Cancer Treatment through Machine Learning.

Yu Y, Liu S, Geller D, Luo J Am J Pathol. 2024; 194(7):1262-1271.

PMID: 38537933 PMC: 11220925. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.02.017.


Zmym4 is required for early cranial gene expression and craniofacial cartilage formation.

Jourdeuil K, Neilson K, Cousin H, Tavares A, Majumdar H, Alfandari D Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1274788.

PMID: 37854072 PMC: 10579616. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1274788.

References
1.
Rosenkrantz A, Oto A, Turkbey B, Westphalen A . Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), Version 2: A Critical Look. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 206(6):1179-83. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.15.15765. View

2.
Siegel R, Miller K, Fuchs H, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022; 72(1):7-33. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21708. View

3.
Zhao S, Chen W, Li H, Foye A, Zhang M, Sjostrom M . The DNA methylation landscape of advanced prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2020; 52(8):778-789. PMC: 7454228. DOI: 10.1038/s41588-020-0648-8. View

4.
Yu Y, Liu S, Nelson J, Luo J . Detection of fusion gene transcripts in the blood samples of prostate cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):16995. PMC: 8379170. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96528-9. View

5.
Zhao F, Wang J, Chen M, Chen D, Ye S, Li X . Sites of synchronous distant metastases and prognosis in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases at initial diagnosis: a population-based study of 16,643 patients. Clin Transl Med. 2019; 8(1):30. PMC: 6884608. DOI: 10.1186/s40169-019-0247-4. View