» Articles » PMID: 36680047

Differential Replication and Cytokine Response Between Vaccine and Very Virulent Marek's Disease Viruses in Spleens and Bursas During Latency and Reactivation

Overview
Journal Viruses
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36680047
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Marek's disease virus (MDV) infection results in Marek's disease (MD) in chickens, a lymphoproliferative and oncogenic deadly disease, leading to severe economic losses. The spleen and bursa are the most important lymphoid and major target organs for MDV replication. The immune response elicited by MDV replication in the spleen and bursa is critical for the formation of latent MDV infection and reactivation. However, the mechanism of the host immune response induced by MDV in these key lymphoid organs during the latent and reactivation infection phases is not well understood. In the study, we focused on the replication dynamics of a vaccine MDV strain MDV/CVI988 and a very virulent MDV strain MDV/RB1B in the spleen and bursa in the latent and reactivation infection phases (7-28 days post-inoculation [dpi]), as well as the expression of some previously characterized immune-related molecules. The results showed that the replication ability of MDV/RB1B was significantly stronger than that of MDV/CVI988 within 28 days post-infection, and the replication levels of both MDV strains in the spleen were significantly higher than those in the bursa. During the latent and reactivation phase of MDV infection (7-28 dpi), the transcriptional upregulation of chicken IL-1β, IL6, IL-8L1 IFN-γ and PML in the spleen and bursa induced by MDV/RB1B infection was overall stronger than that of MDV/CVI988. However, compared to MDV/RB1Binfection, MDV/CVI988 infection resulted in a more effective transcriptional activation of CCL4 in the latent infection phase (7-14 dpi), which may be a characteristic distinguishing MDV vaccine strain from the very virulent strain.

References
1.
Bavananthasivam J, Astill J, Matsuyama-Kato A, Taha-Abdelaziz K, Shojadoost B, Sharif S . Gut microbiota is associated with protection against Marek's disease virus infection in chickens. Virology. 2020; 553:122-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2020.10.011. View

2.
Kaiser P, Underwood G, Davison F . Differential cytokine responses following Marek's disease virus infection of chickens differing in resistance to Marek's disease. J Virol. 2002; 77(1):762-8. PMC: 140586. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.77.1.762-768.2003. View

3.
Jones D, Neff C, Palmer B, Stenmark K, Nagel M . Varicella zoster virus-infected cerebrovascular cells produce a proinflammatory environment. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2017; 4(5):e382. PMC: 5682918. DOI: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000382. View

4.
Berthault C, Larcher T, Hartle S, Vautherot J, Trapp-Fragnet L, Denesvre C . Atrophy of primary lymphoid organs induced by Marek's disease virus during early infection is associated with increased apoptosis, inhibition of cell proliferation and a severe B-lymphopenia. Vet Res. 2018; 49(1):31. PMC: 5870490. DOI: 10.1186/s13567-018-0526-x. View

5.
Rai T, Glass M, Cole J, Rather M, Marsden M, Neilson M . Histone chaperone HIRA deposits histone H3.3 onto foreign viral DNA and contributes to anti-viral intrinsic immunity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(20):11673-11683. PMC: 5691367. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx771. View