» Articles » PMID: 36679083

As a Model Species to Decrypt the Role of Ethylene in Plant Adaptation to Salinity

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36679083
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to develop an experimental system for an exploration of ethylene-dependent responses using intact growing plants and to approbate the system for assessing the role of ethylene in salinity tolerance and ion accumulation. Plants were cultivated in sealed plastic containers in a modified gaseous atmosphere by introducing ethylene or 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP), a competitive inhibitor of ethylene action. High humidity inside the containers induced a fast elongation of the leaf petioles of . The effect was ethylene-dependent, as 1-MCP completely blocked it, but exogenous ethylene further promoted petiole elongation. Exogenous ethylene decreased (by 48%) but 1-MCP increased (by 48%) the Na accumulation in leaf blades of NaCl-treated plants. The experimental system was further calibrated with ethylene and silica xerogel, and the optimum concentrations were found for inducing leaf petiole elongation (10 μL L ethylene) and preventing leaf petiole elongation (200 g silica xerogel per 24 L), respectively. The second experiment involved a treatment with NaCl in the presence of 1-MCP, ethylene, or 1-MCP + ethylene, both in normal and high air humidity conditions. In high humidity conditions, NaCl inhibited petiole elongation by 25% and ethylene treatment fully reversed this inhibition and stimulated elongation by 12% in comparison to the response of the control plants. Treatment with 1-MCP fully prevented this ethylene effect. In normal humidity conditions, NaCl inhibited petiole elongation by 20%, which was reversed by ethylene without additional elongation stimulation. However, 1-MCP only partially inhibited the ethylene effect on petiole elongation. In high humidity conditions, ethylene inhibited Na accumulation in NaCl-treated plants by 14%, but 1-MCP reversed this effect. In conclusion, the stimulation of endogenous ethylene production in plants at a high air humidity or in flooded conditions reverses the inhibitory effect of salinity on plant growth and concomitantly inhibits the accumulation of Na in tissues. is a highly promising model species for use in studies regarding ethylene-dependent salinity responses and ion accumulation potential involving the manipulation of a gaseous environment.

Citing Articles

Effect of Na, K and Ca Salts on Growth, Physiological Performance, Ion Accumulation and Mineral Nutrition of .

Jekabsone A, Karlsons A, Osvalde A, Ievinsh G Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(2).

PMID: 38256743 PMC: 10818879. DOI: 10.3390/plants13020190.


Water Content of Plant Tissues: So Simple That Almost Forgotten?.

Ievinsh G Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(6).

PMID: 36986926 PMC: 10058729. DOI: 10.3390/plants12061238.

References
1.
Cuin T, Betts S, Chalmandrier R, Shabala S . A root's ability to retain K+ correlates with salt tolerance in wheat. J Exp Bot. 2008; 59(10):2697-706. PMC: 2486465. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ern128. View

2.
Zapata P, Serrano M, Garcia-Legaz M, Pretel M, Botella M . Short Term Effect of Salt Shock on Ethylene and Polyamines Depends on Plant Salt Sensitivity. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8:855. PMC: 5440749. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00855. View

3.
Pan Y, Liu L, Lin Y, Zu Y, Li L, Tang Z . Ethylene Antagonizes Salt-Induced Growth Retardation and Cell Death Process via Transcriptional Controlling of Ethylene-, BAG- and Senescence-Associated Genes in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7:696. PMC: 4872043. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00696. View

4.
Tassoni A, Watkins C, Davies P . Inhibition of the ethylene response by 1-MCP in tomato suggests that polyamines are not involved in delaying ripening, but may moderate the rate of ripening or over-ripening. J Exp Bot. 2006; 57(12):3313-25. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erl092. View

5.
Tiwari K, Paliyath G . Microarray analysis of ripening-regulated gene expression and its modulation by 1-MCP and hexanal. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2011; 49(3):329-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.01.007. View