Natural and Technical Phytoremediation of Oil-Contaminated Soil
Overview
Affiliations
Natural and technical phytoremediation approaches were compared for their efficacy in decontaminating oil-polluted soil. We examined 20 oil-contaminated sites of 800 to 12,000 m each, with different contamination types (fresh or aged) and levels (4.2-27.4 g/kg). The study was conducted on a field scale in the industrial and adjacent areas of a petroleum refinery. Technical remediation with alfalfa ( L.), ryegrass ( L.), nitrogen fertilizer, and soil agrotechnical treatment was used to clean up 10 sites contaminated by oil hydrocarbons (average concentration, 13.7 g/kg). In technical phytoremediation, the per-year decontamination of soil was as high as 72-90%, whereas in natural phytoremediation (natural attenuation with native vegetation) at 10 other oil-contaminated sites, per-year decontamination was as high as that only after 5 years. Rhizodegradation is supposed as the principal mechanisms of both phytoremediation approaches.
Wyszkowska J, Borowik A, Zaborowska M, Kucharski J Molecules. 2025; 29(24.
PMID: 39769927 PMC: 11677455. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29245838.
Microbe-plant-nanoparticle interactions: role in bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons.
Unimke A, Okezie O, Mohammed S, Mmuoegbulam A, Abdullahi S, Ofon U Water Sci Technol. 2024; 90(10):2870-2893.
PMID: 39612179 DOI: 10.2166/wst.2024.362.
Wyszkowska J, Borowik A, Zaborowska M, Kucharski J Materials (Basel). 2023; 16(10).
PMID: 37241368 PMC: 10221480. DOI: 10.3390/ma16103738.