» Articles » PMID: 36675786

Three-Dimensional Accuracy and Stability of Personalized Implants in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36675786
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This systematic review aimed to determine the accuracy/stability of patient-specific osteosynthesis (PSI) in orthognathic surgery according to three-dimensional (3D) outcome analysis and in comparison to conventional osteosynthesis and computer-aided designed and manufactured (CAD/CAM) splints or wafers. The PRISMA guidelines were followed and six academic databases and Google Scholar were searched. Records reporting 3D accuracy/stability measurements of bony segments fixated with PSI were included. Of 485 initial records, 21 met the eligibility (566 subjects), nine of which also qualified for a meta-analysis (164 subjects). Six studies had a high risk of bias (29%), and the rest were of low or moderate risk. Procedures comprised either single-piece or segmental Le Fort I and/or mandibular osteotomy and/or genioplasty. A stratified meta-analysis including 115 subjects with single-piece Le Fort I PSI showed that the largest absolute mean deviations were 0.5 mm antero-posteriorly and 0.65° in pitch. PSIs were up to 0.85 mm and 2.35° more accurate than conventional osteosynthesis with CAD/CAM splint or wafer (p < 0.0001). However, the clinical relevance of the improved accuracy has not been shown. The literature on PSI for multi-piece Le Fort I, mandibular osteotomies and genioplasty procedure is characterized by high methodological heterogeneity and a lack of randomized controlled trials. The literature is lacking on the 3D stability of bony segments fixated with PSI.

Citing Articles

Novel CAD/CAM-splint-based navigation protocol enhances intraoperative maxillary position control in orthognathic surgery: a case control study.

Schrader F, Saigo L, Kubler N, Rana M, Wilkat M Head Face Med. 2025; 21(1):1.

PMID: 39794777 PMC: 11721267. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-024-00477-3.


3D printing materials and 3D printed surgical devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: design, workflow and effectiveness.

Wang X, Mu M, Yan J, Han B, Ye R, Guo G Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae066.

PMID: 39169972 PMC: 11338467. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae066.


Current Trends in Orthognathic Surgery.

Zammit D, Ettinger R, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Susarla S Medicina (Kaunas). 2023; 59(12).

PMID: 38138203 PMC: 10744503. DOI: 10.3390/medicina59122100.


Accuracy of Patient-Specific Implants in Virtually Planned Segmental Le Fort I Osteotomies.

Kuehle R, Scheurer M, Bouffleur F, Fuchs J, Engel M, Hoffmann J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(18).

PMID: 37762977 PMC: 10532412. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12186038.


The Position of the Virtual Hinge Axis in Relation to the Maxilla in Digital Orthognathic Surgery Planning-A k-Means Cluster Analysis.

Stamm T, Kanemeier M, Dirksen D, Middelberg C, Hohoff A, Kleinheinz J J Clin Med. 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37240688 PMC: 10219012. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103582.


References
1.
Almukhtar A, Ju X, Khambay B, McDonald J, Ayoub A . Comparison of the accuracy of voxel based registration and surface based registration for 3D assessment of surgical change following orthognathic surgery. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e93402. PMC: 3973674. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093402. View

2.
Verhelst P, Shaheen E, Vasconcelos K, Van der Cruyssen F, Shujaat S, Coudyzer W . Validation of a 3D CBCT-based protocol for the follow-up of mandibular condyle remodeling. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019; 49(3):20190364. PMC: 7068073. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190364. View

3.
Sanchez-Jauregui E, Baranda-Manterola E, Ranz-Colio A, Bueno de Vicente A, Acero-Sanz J . Custom made cutting guides and osteosynthesis plates versus CAD/CAM occlusal splints in positioning and fixation of the maxilla in orthognathic surgery: A prospective randomized study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2022; 50(8):609-614. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2022.05.010. View

4.
Zavattero E, Gerbino G, Borbon C, Ramieri G . Conformity of the Virtual Surgical Plan to the Actual Result Comparing Five Craniofacial Procedure Types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 150(2):484e-485e. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009309. View

5.
Abel A, Ho K, Neugarten J . What Is the Accuracy of Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery Using Occlusally-Based Guides and Patient-Specific Fixation in Both Jaws? A Cohort Study and Discussion of Surgical Techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 80(12):1912-1926. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2022.08.009. View