» Articles » PMID: 36675651

The Value of the First Clinical Impression As Assessed by 18 Observations in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36675651
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The first clinical impression of emergency patients conveys a myriad of information that has been incompletely elucidated. In this prospective, observational study, the value of the first clinical impression, assessed by 18 observations, to predict the need for timely medical attention, the need for hospital admission, and in-hospital mortality in 1506 adult patients presenting to the triage desk of an emergency department was determined. Machine learning models were used for statistical analysis. The first clinical impression could predict the need for timely medical attention [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC), 0.73; p = 0.01] and hospital admission (AUC ROC, 0.8; p = 0.004), but not in-hospital mortality (AUC ROC, 0.72; p = 0.13). The five most important features informing the prediction models were age, ability to walk, admission by emergency medical services, lying on a stretcher, breathing pattern, and bringing a suitcase. The inability to walk at triage presentation was highly predictive of both the need for timely medical attention (p < 0.001) and the need for hospital admission (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the first clinical impression of emergency patients presenting to the triage desk can predict the need for timely medical attention and hospital admission. Important components of the first clinical impression were identified.

Citing Articles

Clinical Gestalt to Predict Bacterial Infection and Mortality in Emergency Department Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Espejo T, Nieves-Ortega R, Amsler L, Riedel H, Balestra G, Rosin C J Gen Intern Med. 2025; .

PMID: 40011418 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09440-7.


Exploiting the Features of Clinical Judgment to Improve Assessment of Disease Severity in the Emergency Department: An Acutelines Study.

Visser M, Rossi D, Bouma H, Ter Maaten J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592702 PMC: 10931686. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051359.

References
1.
Heal C, Cotterill S, Rowland A, Garratt N, Long T, Brown S . Inter-rater reliability of paediatric emergency assessment: physiological and clinical features. Arch Dis Child. 2020; 106(2):149-153. PMC: 7841473. DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318664. View

2.
Zou J, Han Y, So S . Overview of artificial neural networks. Methods Mol Biol. 2008; 458:15-23. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_2. View

3.
Lee E, Kwok E, Vaillancourt C . Using emergency physicians' abilities to predict patient admission to decrease admission delay time. Emerg Med J. 2020; 37(7):417-422. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208859. View

4.
Quinten V, van Meurs M, Wolffensperger A, Ter Maaten J, Ligtenberg J . Sepsis patients in the emergency department: stratification using the Clinical Impression Score, Predisposition, Infection, Response and Organ dysfunction score or quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score?. Eur J Emerg Med. 2017; 25(5):328-334. PMC: 6133213. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000460. View

5.
Luo G, Stone B, Johnson M, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Wilcox A, Mooney S . Automating Construction of Machine Learning Models With Clinical Big Data: Proposal Rationale and Methods. JMIR Res Protoc. 2017; 6(8):e175. PMC: 5596298. DOI: 10.2196/resprot.7757. View