» Articles » PMID: 36673806

Comparison of Visual Skills Between Federated and Non-Federated Athletes

Abstract

Background: To perform motor tasks, athletes must gather a considerable amount of visual information quickly. Evidence shows that visual skills vary between athletes and non-athletes, and impact athletic performance. However, there is no scientific evidence suggesting that there are any differences between the visual skills of federated and non-federated athletes. As such, the objective of this paper was to compare how visual skills influence the sports performance of federated and non-federated athletes, respectively. Methods: A visual examination has been conducted on a total of 52 athletes between 18 and 37 years of age. The COI-Sport Vision system screen (International Optometry Center, Madrid, Spain) was used to examine static visual acuity, dynamic visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, stereopsis, fixation disparity, visual memory, identification, anticipation time, peripheral awareness, and hand-eye coordination. Results: On average, federated athletes train more hours per day than non-federated athletes (1.4 ± 0.8) (p = 0.046). A significant correlation was observed between the average time of visual memory (β = −0.0683, p < 0.001), the average time of anticipation (β = 0.006, p = 0.009), the average time of peripheral awareness (β = 0.026, p = 0.002), hand-eye coordination (β = 0.028, p = 0.004), dynamic visual acuity (β = 0.055, p < 0.001), and the number of training hours. Conclusion: Results suggest that federated athletes are more concerned about their ocular health. Nonetheless, no differences were found in the oculomotor skills of both groups. Further investigation is required to consider each sport discipline individually.

Citing Articles

Light-based manipulation of visual processing speed during soccer-specific training has a positive impact on visual and visuomotor abilities in professional soccer players.

Rodrigues P, Woodburn J, Bond A, Stockman A, Vera J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024; 45(2):504-513.

PMID: 39564808 PMC: 11823300. DOI: 10.1111/opo.13423.

References
1.
Paulus J, Tong J, Hornegger J, Schmidt M, Eskofier B, Michelson G . Extended stereopsis evaluation of professional and amateur soccer players and subjects without soccer background. Front Psychol. 2014; 5:1186. PMC: 4202718. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01186. View

2.
Erickson G . Topical Review: Visual Performance Assessments for Sport. Optom Vis Sci. 2021; 98(7):672-680. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001731. View

3.
Nascimento H, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Martinez-Perez C, Sanchez-Tena M . Differences in Visuospatial Expertise between Skeet Shooting Athletes and Non-Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(15). PMC: 8346005. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18158147. View

4.
Nascimento H, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Martinez-Perez C, Sanchez-Tena M . Vision in Futsal Players: Coordination and Reaction Time. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(17). PMC: 8431160. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179069. View

5.
Wilkerson G, Simpson K, Clark R . Assessment and Training of Visuomotor Reaction Time for Football Injury Prevention. J Sport Rehabil. 2016; 26(1):26-34. DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0068. View