» Articles » PMID: 36672301

Risk Assessment and Pancreatic Cancer: Diagnostic Management and Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the deadliest cancers, and it is responsible for a number of deaths almost equal to its incidence. The high mortality rate is correlated with several explanations; the main one is the late disease stage at which the majority of patients are diagnosed. Since surgical resection has been recognised as the only curative treatment, a PC diagnosis at the initial stage is believed the main tool to improve survival. Therefore, patient stratification according to familial and genetic risk and the creation of screening protocol by using minimally invasive diagnostic tools would be appropriate. Pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are subsets of lesions which deserve special management to avoid overtreatment. The current PC screening programs are based on the annual employment of magnetic resonance imaging with cholangiopancreatography sequences (MR/MRCP) and/or endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). For patients unfit for MRI, computed tomography (CT) could be proposed, although CT results in lower detection rates, compared to MRI, for small lesions. The actual major limit is the incapacity to detect and characterize the pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) by EUS and MR/MRCP. The possibility of utilizing artificial intelligence models to evaluate higher-risk patients could favour the diagnosis of these entities, although more data are needed to support the real utility of these applications in the field of screening. For these motives, it would be appropriate to realize screening programs in research settings.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in the Pancreatic Parenchymal and Delayed Phases for Pancreatic Cancer.

Kurita Y, Utsunomiya D, Kubota K, Koyama S, Hasegawa S, Hosono K Tomography. 2024; 10(10):1591-1604.

PMID: 39453034 PMC: 11510840. DOI: 10.3390/tomography10100117.


Risk Assessment and Radiomics Analysis in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pancreatic Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMN).

Flammia F, Fusco R, Triggiani S, Pellegrino G, Reginelli A, Simonetti I Cancer Control. 2024; 31:10732748241263644.

PMID: 39293798 PMC: 11412216. DOI: 10.1177/10732748241263644.


The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: Current and future perspectives.

Ducas A, Mangano A, Borgioli L, Cassiani J, Lopez P, Giulianotti P Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2024; 29(1):1-4.

PMID: 39228175 PMC: 11830889. DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-130.


Future Perspectives on Radiomics in Acute Liver Injury and Liver Trauma.

Brunese M, Avella P, Cappuccio M, Spiezia S, Pacella G, Bianco P J Pers Med. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929793 PMC: 11204538. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060572.


Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Update of CT-Based Radiomics Applications in the Pre-Surgical Prediction of the Risk of Post-Operative Fistula, Resectability Status and Prognosis.

Pacella G, Brunese M, DImperio E, Rotondo M, Scacchi A, Carbone M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068432 PMC: 10707069. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237380.


References
1.
Sun J, Li H, Gao J, Li J, Li M, Zhou Z . Performance evaluation of a deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm in "double low" chest CTA in children: a feasibility study. Radiol Med. 2021; 126(9):1181-1188. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01384-2. View

2.
Granata V, Catalano O, Fusco R, Tatangelo F, Rega D, Nasti G . The target sign in colorectal liver metastases: an atypical Gd-EOB-DTPA "uptake" on the hepatobiliary phase of MR imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40(7):2364-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0488-7. View

3.
Ansari D, Amini J, Edman M, Andersson R . IPMN of the pancreas - does histological subtyping allow for improved stratification and follow-up?. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021; 56(7):862-864. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1922745. View

4.
Gebauer L, Moltz J, Muhlberg A, Holch J, Huber T, Enke J . Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers of the Whole Liver Tumor Burden Improve Survival Prediction in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(22). PMC: 8616514. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13225732. View

5.
Park S, Kim Y, Choi J . Dosimetric analysis of the effects of a temporary tissue expander on the radiotherapy technique. Radiol Med. 2020; 126(3):437-444. DOI: 10.1007/s11547-020-01297-6. View