» Articles » PMID: 36671572

Intact Transition Epitope Mapping-Force Differences Between Original and Unusual Residues (ITEM-FOUR)

Overview
Journal Biomolecules
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36671572
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Antibody-based point-of-care diagnostics have become indispensable for modern medicine. In-depth analysis of antibody recognition mechanisms is the key to tailoring the accuracy and precision of test results, which themselves are crucial for targeted and personalized therapy. A rapid and robust method is desired by which binding strengths between antigens and antibodies of concern can be fine-mapped with amino acid residue resolution to examine the assumedly serious effects of single amino acid polymorphisms on insufficiencies of antibody-based detection capabilities of, e.g., life-threatening conditions such as myocardial infarction. The experimental ITEM-FOUR approach makes use of modern mass spectrometry instrumentation to investigate intact immune complexes in the gas phase. ITEM-FOUR together with molecular dynamics simulations, enables the determination of the influences of individually exchanged amino acid residues within a defined epitope on an immune complex's binding strength. Wild-type and mutated epitope peptides were ranked according to their experimentally determined dissociation enthalpies relative to each other, thereby revealing which single amino acid polymorphism caused weakened, impaired, and even abolished antibody binding. Investigating a diagnostically relevant human cardiac Troponin I epitope for which seven nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms are known to exist in the human population tackles a medically relevant but hitherto unsolved problem of current antibody-based point-of-care diagnostics.

Citing Articles

Mass spectrometry-complemented molecular modeling predicts the interaction interface for a camelid single-domain antibody targeting the circumsporozoite protein's C-terminal domain.

Opuni K, Russ M, Geens R, Vocht L, Wielendaele P, Debuy C Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 23:3300-3314.

PMID: 39296809 PMC: 11409006. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.08.023.


Intact Transition Epitope Mapping-Force Interferences by Variable Extensions (ITEM-FIVE).

Koy C, Rower C, Thiesen H, Neamtu A, Glocker M Biomolecules. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 38672470 PMC: 11048379. DOI: 10.3390/biom14040454.


Mass Spectrometric ITEM-ONE and ITEM-TWO Analyses Confirm and Refine an Assembled Epitope of an Anti-Pertuzumab Affimer.

Rower C, Olaleye O, Bischoff R, Glocker M Biomolecules. 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38254624 PMC: 10813730. DOI: 10.3390/biom14010024.


Intact Transition Epitope Mapping-Serological Inspection by Epitope EXtraction (ITEM-SIX).

Zammataro A, Koy C, Russ M, Rower C, Glocker M Molecules. 2023; 28(7).

PMID: 37049857 PMC: 10096252. DOI: 10.3390/molecules28073092.

References
1.
Hyytia H, Heikkila T, Hedberg P, Puolakanaho T, Pettersson K . Skeletal troponin I cross-reactivity in different cardiac troponin I assay versions. Clin Biochem. 2015; 48(4-5):313-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.12.028. View

2.
Dyson H, Wright P . Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 6(3):197-208. DOI: 10.1038/nrm1589. View

3.
Savukoski T, Twarda A, Hellberg S, Ristiniemi N, Wittfooth S, Sinisalo J . Epitope specificity and IgG subclass distribution of autoantibodies to cardiac troponin. Clin Chem. 2013; 59(3):512-8. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.194860. View

4.
Yefremova Y, Melder F, Danquah B, Opuni K, Koy C, Ehrens A . Apparent activation energies of protein-protein complex dissociation in the gas-phase determined by electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017; 409(28):6549-6558. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-017-0603-4. View

5.
Arthur-Farraj P, Mirsky R, Parkinson D, Jessen K . A double point mutation in the DNA-binding region of Egr2 switches its function from inhibition to induction of proliferation: A potential contribution to the development of congenital hypomyelinating neuropathy. Neurobiol Dis. 2006; 24(1):159-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.06.006. View