» Articles » PMID: 36670815

Horse Housing on Prince Edward Island, Canada: Attitudes and Experiences Related to Keeping Horses Outdoors and in Groups

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 Jan 21
PMID 36670815
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Limited research has assessed the "human dimension" of horse care. The aims of this study were to (1) understand horse owner attitudes toward horse welfare when kept outdoors versus indoors and in groups versus individually, (2) compare horse owner attitudes toward horse welfare with the ways in which they house their horses, and (3) explore horse owner reasons for and challenges with their horses' housing. Seventy-six horse owners in Prince Edward Island, Canada completed a questionnaire. Non-parametric tests and quantitative content analysis were used for data analysis. Consistent with the way horses were kept, most (82-96%) owners agreed that horses' physical health, mental well-being, and natural living were better when kept outdoors and in groups. Fewer (64-68%) participants agreed that the horses' standard of care was better when kept outdoors or in groups. Results show associations between owners whose attitudes suggest indoor and/or individual housing is better for horse welfare and keeping their horses indoors part-time and/or individually. Two overarching themes were developed from owners' responses regarding their reasons and challenges related to the ways in which horses were housed: horse-centered and owner-centered care. The results indicate that horse owners' choices about their horses' housing correspond to beliefs about improved horse welfare.

Citing Articles

Forage, freedom of movement, and social interactions remain essential fundamentals for the welfare of high-level sport horses.

Phelipon R, Hennes N, Ruet A, Bret-Morel A, Gorecka-Bruzda A, Lansade L Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1504116.

PMID: 39634765 PMC: 11615640. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1504116.


'It's more emotionally based': Prince Edward Island horse owner perspectives of horse weight management.

Ross M, Proudfoot K, Campbell Nishimura E, Morabito E, Merkies K, Mitchell J Anim Welf. 2024; 33:e14.

PMID: 38510426 PMC: 10951667. DOI: 10.1017/awf.2024.9.

References
1.
Christie J, Hewson C, Riley C, McNiven M, Dohoo I, Bate L . Demographics, management, and welfare of nonracing horses in Prince Edward Island. Can Vet J. 2005; 45(12):1004-11. PMC: 554751. View

2.
Luna D, Tadich T . Why Should Human-Animal Interactions Be Included in Research of Working Equids' Welfare?. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(2). PMC: 6406816. DOI: 10.3390/ani9020042. View

3.
DeBoer M, Jaqueth A, Tuszka A, Martinson K . Winter blanketing practices: An online survey of North American horse owners. J Equine Vet Sci. 2022; 113:103911. DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.103911. View

4.
Luna D, Vasquez R, Rojas M, Tadich T . Welfare Status of Working Horses and Owners' Perceptions of Their Animals. Animals (Basel). 2017; 7(8). PMC: 5575568. DOI: 10.3390/ani7080056. View

5.
Mellor D . Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2017; 7(8). PMC: 5575572. DOI: 10.3390/ani7080060. View