» Articles » PMID: 36658540

Differences in the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Osteoporosis in Chinese Urban and Rural Regions: a Cross-sectional Study

Abstract

Background: Bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalence of osteoporosis may differ between urban and rural populations. This study aimed to investigate the differences in BMD characteristics between urban and rural populations in Jiangsu, China.

Methods: A total of 2,711 participants aged 20 years and older were included in the cross-sectional study. Multistage and stratified cluster random sampling was used as the sampling strategy. BMD was measured by the method of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Data were collected through questionnaires/interview. BMD values at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck, total hip, and greater trochanter were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate the characteristics of urban and rural participants. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to analyze the factors that may be associated with osteoporosis in urban and rural populations.

Results: Of these participants, 1,540 (50.49%) were females and 1,363 (42.14%) were from urban. The prevalence of osteoporosis in urban and rural populations was 5.52% and 10.33%, respectively. In terms of gender, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 2.68% in males and 13.82% in females. For menopausal status, the prevalence of osteoporosis was 30.34% in postmenopausal females and 4.78% in premenopausal females. In urban populations, older age [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.36, 95%CI, 2.35-2.36), hypertension (AOR = 1.37, 95%CI, 1.36-1.37), unmarried (AOR = 4.04, 95%CI, 3.99-4.09), smoking everyday (AOR = 2.26, 95%CI, 2.23-2.28), family history of osteoporosis (AOR = 1.66, 95%CI, 1.65-1.67), dyslipidemia (AOR = 1.05, 95%CI, 1.04-1.05), and higher β-crosslaps (β-CTX) level (AOR = 1.02, 95%CI, 1.02-1.02) were associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis, while males (AOR = 0.04, 95%CI, 0.04-0.04), higher education level (AOR = 0.95, 95%CI, 0.95-0.95), and aquatic product intake (AOR = 0.99, 95%CI, 0.99-0.99) were related to decreased risk of osteoporosis. Similar results were also observed in rural populations, and (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The prevalence of osteoporosis in rural populations was higher than that in urban populations, and the factors associated with the risk of osteoporosis were similar in urban and rural populations.

Citing Articles

Osteoporosis in men-East and West: Can the twain meet? A perspective from Asia.

Sng G, Reginster J, Alokail M, Chandran M Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2025; 10(4):131-144.

PMID: 39835326 PMC: 11742312. DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2024.11.001.


Geographical variation in osteoporosis in Australian women: a longitudinal analysis over 23 years.

Jones A, Enticott J, Ebeling P, Mishra G, Teede H, Vincent A Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):106.

PMID: 39496826 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01463-7.


Prevalence rate of primary osteoporosis in China: a meta-analysis.

Lyu F, Ramoo V, Chui P, Ng C, Zhang Y BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):1518.

PMID: 38844897 PMC: 11155107. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18932-w.


Nonthermal biocompatible plasma in stimulating osteogenic differentiation by targeting p38/ FOXO1 and PI3K/AKT pathways in hBMSCs.

Akter K, Kim Y, Choi E, Han I J Biol Eng. 2024; 18(1):35.

PMID: 38807230 PMC: 11134625. DOI: 10.1186/s13036-024-00419-2.


U-shaped relationship found between fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio and systemic inflammation response index in osteoporotic fracture patients.

Zhou X, Lu K, Liu Z, Xu M, Li C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):11299.

PMID: 38760436 PMC: 11101643. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61965-9.


References
1.
Tan L, Lei S, Chen X, Liu M, Guo Y, Xu H . Establishment of peak bone mineral density in Southern Chinese males and its comparisons with other males from different regions of China. J Bone Miner Metab. 2007; 25(2):114-21. DOI: 10.1007/s00774-006-0737-5. View

2.
Brennan S, Pasco J, Urquhart D, Oldenburg B, Hanna F, Wluka A . The association between socioeconomic status and osteoporotic fracture in population-based adults: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int. 2008; 20(9):1487-97. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-008-0822-9. View

3.
Kanis J, Johnell O, Oden A, Sembo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Dawson A . Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmö. Osteoporos Int. 2000; 11(8):669-74. DOI: 10.1007/s001980070064. View

4.
Wang L, Yu W, Yin X, Cui L, Tang S, Jiang N . Prevalence of Osteoporosis and Fracture in China: The China Osteoporosis Prevalence Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4(8):e2121106. PMC: 8369359. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.21106. View

5.
Chandra A, Rajawat J . Skeletal Aging and Osteoporosis: Mechanisms and Therapeutics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(7). PMC: 8037620. DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073553. View