» Articles » PMID: 36656510

HER2-low-positive and Response to NACT and Prognosis in HER2-negative Non-metastatic BC

Overview
Journal Breast Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jan 19
PMID 36656510
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: With the release of promising data from clinical trials of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates, there is a new therapeutic direction in HER2-low expression breast cancer (BC). This study aims to evaluate the differences in clinicopathological characteristics of HER2-low-positive and HER2-zero BC, including response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and prognosis.

Methods: Records of HER2-negative (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 0, + 1, or + 2 non-amplified by in situ hybridization [ISH]) patients who received NACT at our cancer center between January 2017 and December 2017 were retrospectively collected. HER2-low-positive was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1 + or IHC2 + /in-situ hybridization negative and HER2-zero was defined as IHC0. The coprimary objectives were to compare pathological complete response (pCR) and relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the two groups. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models and Cox-proportional hazards models were performed for analysis of the endpoints pCR, RFS, and OS.

Results: A total of 239 [84.5%] of 283 tumors were HER2-low-positive (including 132 [55.2%] HER2-1 + and 107 [44.8%] HER2-2 + /ISH non-amplified) and 44 [15.5%] were HER2-zero. Patients in the HER2-low-positive group had more commonly hormone receptor positivity than HER2-zero patients (188 [78.7%] vs. 19 [43.2%], P = 0.000), but there was no difference between HER2-1 + and HER2-2 + / ISH non-amplified (99 [75.0%] vs. 89 [83.2%], P = 0.125). HER2-zero tumors had a significantly higher pCR rate than HER2-low-positive tumors (15 [34.1%] of 44 vs. 22 [9.2%] of 239, P = 0.000). Pathological complete response was also significantly higher in HER2-zero tumors versus HER2-low-positive tumors in the hormone receptor-negative subgroup (13 [52.0%] of 25 vs. 14 [27.5%] of 51, P = 0.036), but not in the hormone receptor-positive subgroup (2 [10.5%] of 19 vs 8 [4.3%] of 188, P = 0.231). No significant difference was observed in 5-year RFS between the two groups (HR 0.577, 95% CI 0.298-1.118, P = 0.103). However, HER2-low-positive tumors showed significantly better OS than HER2-zero tumors (HR 0.280, 95% CI 0.122-0.697, P = 0.006).

Conclusions: These results suggest that HER2-low-positive tumors have specific biological characteristics according to the hormone receptor status and exhibit different responses to NACT and prognosis.

Citing Articles

The prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study.

Ozyurt N, Alkan A, Gulbagci B, Seyyar M, Asik E, Sahbazlar M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23556.

PMID: 39384975 PMC: 11464793. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75293-5.


The Prognostic Impact of HER2-Low and Menopausal Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Park W, Nam S, Kim S, Lee J, Yu J, Lee S Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(14).

PMID: 39061205 PMC: 11274797. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16142566.


Survival outcomes in HER2-low versus HER2-zero breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Xia L, Cao X, Yu Y World J Surg Oncol. 2024; 22(1):106.

PMID: 38643188 PMC: 11031865. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03382-w.


The Modified Neo-Bioscore System for Staging Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy Based on Prognostic Significance of HER2-Low Expression.

Zhao Y, Chen X, Wang Y, Zhang X, Lu J, Yin W J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610617 PMC: 11012268. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071850.


Prognostic Impact of HER2-Low and HER2-Zero in Resectable Breast Cancer with Different Hormone Receptor Status: A Landmark Analysis of Real-World Data from the National Cancer Center of China.

Dai Q, Feng K, Liu G, Cheng H, Tong X, Wang X Target Oncol. 2024; 19(1):81-93.

PMID: 38265547 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-01030-z.


References
1.
Slamon D, Clark G, Wong S, Levin W, Ullrich A, McGuire W . Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science. 1987; 235(4785):177-82. DOI: 10.1126/science.3798106. View

2.
Slamon D, Godolphin W, Jones L, Holt J, Wong S, Keith D . Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science. 1989; 244(4905):707-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.2470152. View

3.
Ross J, Fletcher J . The HER-2/neu oncogene in breast cancer: prognostic factor, predictive factor, and target for therapy. Stem Cells. 1998; 16(6):413-28. DOI: 10.1002/stem.160413. View

4.
Woo J, Lee K, Chung Y, Jang M, Ahn S, Park S . The updated 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 interpretation in breast cancer: comparison with previous guidelines and clinical significance of the.... Hum Pathol. 2020; 98:10-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.01.003. View

5.
Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart M, Gelber R, Procter M, Goldhirsch A, de Azambuja E . 11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet. 2017; 389(10075):1195-1205. PMC: 5465633. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32616-2. View