» Articles » PMID: 36653418

The Performance of Protected-area Expansions in Representing Tropical Andean Species: Past Trends and Climate Change Prospects

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Jan 18
PMID 36653418
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protected area (PA) extent has increased significantly over the last 150 years globally, but it is yet unclear whether progress in expanding coverage has been accompanied by improved performance in ecological representation. Here, we explore temporal trends in the performance of PA networks in representing > 16,000 vertebrate and plant species in tropical Andean countries based on species bioclimatic niche modelling. We use a randomization analysis to assess whether representation gains over time (1937-2015) are the expected consequence of increasing the overall area of the network or the result of better designed networks. We also explore the impact of climate change on protected-area representation based on projected species distributions in 2070. We found that PAs added in the last three to four decades were better at representing species diversity than random additions overall. Threatened species, amphibians and reptiles are the exception. Species representation is projected to decrease across PAs under climate change, although PA expansions over the last decade (2006-2015) better represented species' future bioclimatic niches than did sites selected at random for most evaluated groups. These findings indicate an unbalanced representation across taxa, and raises concern over under-represented groups, including threatened species, and species' representation under climate change scenarios. However, they also suggest that decisions related to locating protected areas have become more strategic in recent decades and illustrate that indicators tracking representativeness of networks are crucial in PA monitoring frameworks.

References
1.
Pimm S, Jenkins C, Abell R, Brooks T, Gittleman J, Joppa L . The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science. 2014; 344(6187):1246752. DOI: 10.1126/science.1246752. View

2.
Watson J, Evans T, Venter O, Williams B, Tulloch A, Stewart C . The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat Ecol Evol. 2018; 2(4):599-610. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x. View

3.
Potapov P, Hansen M, Laestadius L, Turubanova S, Yaroshenko A, Thies C . The last frontiers of wilderness: Tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci Adv. 2017; 3(1):e1600821. PMC: 5235335. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1600821. View

4.
Lessmann J, Munoz J, Bonaccorso E . Maximizing species conservation in continental Ecuador: a case of systematic conservation planning for biodiverse regions. Ecol Evol. 2014; 4(12):2410-22. PMC: 4203289. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1102. View

5.
Kujala H, Moilanen A, Araujo M, Cabeza M . Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2):e53315. PMC: 3566137. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053315. View