» Articles » PMID: 36651837

Optimization of Radium-223 Treatment of Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Based on the Burden of Skeletal Metastasis and Clinical Parameters

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Jan 18
PMID 36651837
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) is now frequently used to treat prostate cancer that has metastasized to bone, although patient selection continues to be suboptimal for determining who will benefit most from this novel treatment modality.

Materials And Methods: Seventy-nine patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) were treated with Ra-223 from 2012 to 2016. The burden of skeletal metastasis was determined for each using the Bone Scan Index (BSI) as a ratio of diseased to normal bone. Clinical, laboratory, and survival data were collected and examined for associations with BSI, and treatment tolerability was assessed.

Results: Chemotherapy-naïve patients were significantly more likely to complete the full course of treatment. Median follow-up was 31 months (range 0.7-38.8 months) and median overall survival was 15.4 months (range 9.5-20.6 months). Overall survival was significantly associated with findings on bone scans (P < .05). Patients with higher BSI tended toward poorer outcomes. Nearly half the patients with low baseline BSI survived 3 years or more following Ra-223 treatment. By contrast, only 20% of the patients with high baseline BSI lived for 1 year, and none lived for an additional 3. Baseline BSI was significantly associated with decreased hemoglobin, higher serum PSA and alkaline phosphatase levels, and treatment-associated reductions in platelet and absolute neutrophil counts.

Conclusion: Our results suggest better outcomes to Ra-223 therapy for patients who are chemotherapy-naïve and who undergo treatment earlier in the course of their disease as reflected by low BSI and concordant laboratory parameters.

Citing Articles

Predictive and Prognostic F-Fluorocholine PET/CT Radiomics Nomogram in Patients with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer with Bone Metastases Treated with Ra.

Cruz-Montijano M, Amo-Salas M, Cassinello-Espinosa J, Garcia-Carbonero I, Villa-Guzman J, Garcia-Vicente A Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39123422 PMC: 11312125. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16152695.


Evaluation of two-dimensional total bone uptake (2D-TBU) and bone scan index (BSI) extracted from active bone metastatic burden on the bone scintigraphy in patients with radium-223 treatment.

Fukai S, Daisaki H, Umeda T, Shimada N, Terauchi T, Koizumi M Ann Nucl Med. 2024; 38(6):450-459.

PMID: 38517659 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-024-01918-4.

References
1.
Sternberg C, Saad F, Graff J, Peer A, Vaishampayan U, Leung E . A randomised phase II trial of three dosing regimens of radium-223 in patients with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020; 31(2):257-265. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.025. View

2.
Frantellizzi V, Pani A, Ippoliti M, Farcomeni A, Aloise I, Colosi M . Scintigraphic load of bone disease evaluated by DASciS software as a survival predictor in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients candidates to 223RaCl treatment. Radiol Oncol. 2019; 54(1):40-47. PMC: 7087429. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2019-0058. View

3.
Anand A, Tragardh E, Edenbrandt L, Beckman L, Svensson J, Thellenberg C . Assessing Radiographic Response to Ra with an Automated Bone Scan Index in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients. J Nucl Med. 2019; 61(5):671-675. PMC: 7198380. DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.231100. View

4.
Miyazaki K, Kuang Y, Kwee S . Changes in Skeletal Tumor Activity on (18)F-choline PET/CT in Patients Receiving (223)Radium Radionuclide Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015; 49(2):160-4. PMC: 4463874. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-014-0314-0. View

5.
Alva A, Nordquist L, Daignault S, George S, Ramos J, Albany C . Clinical Correlates of Benefit From Radium-223 Therapy in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer. Prostate. 2016; 77(5):479-488. DOI: 10.1002/pros.23286. View