» Articles » PMID: 36650102

Mid- to Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Cartilage Restoration of Knee Joint with Allogenic Next-Generation Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI)

Overview
Journal Orthop Surg
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Jan 17
PMID 36650102
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Cartilage defect is a common pathology still lacking a unified treating option. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical and radiological outcome of cartilage restoration of knee joint with allogenic next-generation Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) for the first time, as well as the correlation between postoperative clinical and radiological outcomes and preoperative patient history and demographics.

Methods: From July 2014 to August 2020, 15 patients who went through cartilage restoration with allogenic next-generation MACI were included in this study. Patient demographics and PROM including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee score, Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were obtained preoperatively, at 3, 6, 12 months postoperatively and the last follow-up using an online questionnaire platform. MOCART 2.0 score was calculated at the last follow-up. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare PROM pre- and post-operation, with two-tailed p < 0.05 defined as statistical significant. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate correlation between the PROM and MOCART 2.0 score at the last follow-up with patients demorgraphics.

Results: All patients were followed for an average of 66.47 ± 24.15 months (range, 21-93). All patients were satisfied with the outcome of the surgery and no complication was reported at the end of the study. No significant improvement was observed until 1 year after the implantation, except for IKDC score at 6 months. All PROM showed significant improvement 1 year post-op except for Lysholm score and TAS, which also increased significantly at the time of the last follow-up. Pearson correlation coefficient showed that the size of the defect, before or after debridement, was significantly negatively correlated with final KOOS-Pain (before debridement: r = -0.57, p < 0.05; after debridement: r = -0.54, p < 0.05) and KOOS-Symptoms score (before debridement: r = -0.66, p < 0.05; after debridement: r = -0.67, p < 0.05). The MOCART 2.0 score was found significantly and negatively correlated with BMI (r = -0.60, p < 0.05), and significantly and positively correlated with Lysholm score (r = 0.70, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The next generation MACI with autologous chondrocyte and allogenic chondrocyte ECM scaffold could be used to treat focal articular cartilage defect in the knee joint safely and efficiently with lasting promising outcomes for more than 5 years. The size of the defects should be considered the most negatively correlated parameters influencing the postoperative clinical outcomes.

Citing Articles

Charting a quarter-century of commercial cartilage regeneration products.

Liu X, Guo X, Pei Y, Pei M, Ge Z J Orthop Translat. 2025; 50:354-363.

PMID: 39968336 PMC: 11833628. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.10.009.


[Advances in clinical repair techniques for localized knee cartilage lesions].

Tian G, Li R, Yang Y, Ning C, Guo Q Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024; 38(7):889-895.

PMID: 39013829 PMC: 11252692. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202402056.


Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) Scores > 55 at 6 Months Postoperative Predict Ability to Achieve Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State at Minimum 1 Year Postoperative Following Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation....

Retzky J, Fletcher C, Rizy M, Burge A, Strickland S Cartilage. 2024; 16(1):17-23.

PMID: 38613220 PMC: 11569683. DOI: 10.1177/19476035241244491.


Combination of a human articular cartilage-derived extracellular matrix scaffold and microfracture techniques for cartilage regeneration: A proof of concept in a sheep model.

Peng L, Li H, Deng H, Gao T, Li R, Xu Z J Orthop Translat. 2024; 44:72-87.

PMID: 38259590 PMC: 10801125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2023.09.004.

References
1.
Ebert J, Smith A, Fallon M, Wood D, Ackland T . Correlation Between Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in the Femoral Condyles. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(8):1857-64. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514534942. View

2.
Behrens P, Bitter T, Kurz B, Russlies M . Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI)--5-year follow-up. Knee. 2006; 13(3):194-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2006.02.012. View

3.
Kang H, Peng J, Lu S, Liu S, Zhang L, Huang J . In vivo cartilage repair using adipose-derived stem cell-loaded decellularized cartilage ECM scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012; 8(6):442-53. DOI: 10.1002/term.1538. View

4.
Brittberg M . Cell carriers as the next generation of cell therapy for cartilage repair: a review of the matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation procedure. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 38(6):1259-71. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509346395. View

5.
Ebert J, Fallon M, Ackland T, Janes G, Wood D . Minimum 10-Year Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating 2 Different Approaches to Full Weightbearing After Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation. Am J Sports Med. 2019; 48(1):133-142. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519886548. View