» Articles » PMID: 36647003

Recruitment and Retention into Longitudinal Health Research from an Adolescent Perspective: a Qualitative Study

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Jan 16
PMID 36647003
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: High quality longitudinal studies investigating changes in health behaviours over the transition into early adulthood are critical. However, recruiting and retaining adolescents is challenging. This study explored adolescents' perspectives of signing up to and continuing involvement in a hypothetical longitudinal health research study.

Methods: Forty-eight individuals (15-20y) participated in nine in-person focus groups about recruitment and retention in research. Participants were (a) school students in the last year of compulsory school (Year 11, 15-16y), (b) school/college students in Sixth Form (Year 13, 17-18y), (c) Further Education students studying after secondary education, but not higher education (16-18y) and (d) young adults not in education, employment, or training (18-20y) across England. Thematic analysis resulted in seven themes.

Results: Driving factors for sign-up included social connection e.g., joining with peer groups, personalised feedback, and incentives, primarily financial. Key barriers were lack of interest, the perception of commitment, and timing of recruitment. Young people preferred recruitment processes via social media with messages tailored to their motivations, monthly data collection of maximally 20-30 min, and hybrid data collection with some in-person contact with a consistent, non-judgemental researcher. The provision of autonomy, choice, and financial incentives were perceived to promote retention.

Conclusions: Adolescent recruitment and retention strategies need to align with contemporary interests and motivations. Studies should involve adolescents early to develop a planned, systematic approach to participant sign-up and follow-up. Effective and ineffective recruitment and retention strategies should be reported as part of study findings. Future research should trial how perceived barriers to study engagement can be overcome.

Citing Articles

Bolstering connectedness through peer support: Randomized-controlled trial of a web-based peer support program for adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease.

Ford M, Iuliano A, Walters T, Otley A, Mack D, Jacobson K Health Care Transit. 2024; 3:100085.

PMID: 39712477 PMC: 11657413. DOI: 10.1016/j.hctj.2024.100085.


High STI burden among a cohort of adolescents aged 12-19 years in a youth-friendly clinic in South Africa.

Price M, Kuteesa M, Oladimeji M, Brumskine W, Edward V, Makkan H PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306771.

PMID: 38985722 PMC: 11236123. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306771.


Recruitment and retention of adolescents for an ecological momentary assessment measurement burst mental health study: The MHIM engagement strategy.

Murray A, Xie T, Power L, Condon L Health Expect. 2024; 27(3):e14065.

PMID: 38711174 PMC: 11074385. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14065.


Screening and Retaining Adolescents Recruited Through Social Media: Secondary Analysis from a Longitudinal Clinical Trial.

Weisblum M, Trussell E, Schwinn T, Pacheco A, Nurkin P JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024; 7:e47984.

PMID: 38416559 PMC: 10938224. DOI: 10.2196/47984.


Feasibility of recruiting adolescents into a prospective cohort study of the effects of social isolation during COVID-19.

Kim K, Jergel A, Bai S, Bradley K, Karim B, Shah A Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2023; 9(1):191.

PMID: 38001548 PMC: 10668405. DOI: 10.1186/s40814-023-01418-8.

References
1.
Chen K, Lei H, Li G, Huang W, Mu L . Cash incentives improve participation rate in a face-to-face survey: an intervention study. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 68(2):228-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.08.002. View

2.
Brunsdon D, Biesty L, Brocklehurst P, Brueton V, Devane D, Elliott J . What are the most important unanswered research questions in trial retention? A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership: the PRioRiTy II (Prioritising Retention in Randomised Trials) study. Trials. 2019; 20(1):593. PMC: 6794792. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-019-3687-7. View

3.
Singh A, Mulder C, Twisk J, van Mechelen W, Chinapaw M . Tracking of childhood overweight into adulthood: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2008; 9(5):474-88. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00475.x. View

4.
Cantrell M, Conte T, Hudson M, Shad A, Ruble K, Herth K . Recruitment and retention of older adolescent and young adult female survivors of childhood cancer in longitudinal research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012; 39(5):483-90. PMC: 3927146. DOI: 10.1188/12.ONF.483-490. View

5.
Millstein S, Nightingale E, Petersen A, Mortimer A, Hamburg D . Promoting the healthy development of adolescents. JAMA. 1993; 269(11):1413-5. View