A Dual-Screw Technique for Vertebral Compression Fractures Via Robotic Navigation in the Osteopenic Lumbar Spine: An Biomechanical Analysis

Overview

Journal Global Spine J

Publisher Sage Publications

Date 2023 Jan 16

PMID 36644787

Authors

Michael P Steinmetz

Jessica R Riggleman

Jonathan M Mahoney

Jonathan A Harris

John B Butler

Bryan J Ferrick

Brandon S Bucklen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Study Design: Biomechanical cadaveric study.

Objectives: Multi-rod constructs maximize posterior fixation, but most use a single pedicle screw (PS) anchor point to support multiple rods. Robotic navigation allows for insertion of PS and cortical screw (CS) within the same pedicle, providing 4 points of bony fixation per vertebra. Recent studies demonstrated radiographic feasibility for dual-screw constructs for posterior lumbar spinal fixation; however, biomechanical characterization of this technique is lacking.

Methods: Fourteen cadaveric lumbar specimens (L1-L5) were divided into 2 groups (n = 7): PS, and PS + CS. VCF was simulated at L3. Bilateral posterior screws were placed from L2-L4. Load control (±7.5Nm) testing performed in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR) to measure ROM of: (1) intact; (2) 2-rod construct; (3) 4-rod construct. Static compression testing of 4-rod construct performed at 5 mm/min to measure failure load, axial stiffness.

Results: Four-rod construct was more rigid than 2-rod in FE ( < .001), LB ( < .001), AR ( < .001). Screw technique had no significant effect on FE ( = .516), LB ( = .477), or AR ( = .452). PS + CS 4-rod construct was significantly more stable than PS group ( = .032). Stiffness of PS + CS group (445.8 ± 79.3 N/mm) was significantly greater ( = .019) than PS (317.8 ± 79.8 N/mm). Similarly, failure load of PS + CS group (1824.9 ± 352.2 N) was significantly greater ( = .001) than PS (913.4 ± 309.8 N).

Conclusions: Dual-screw, 4-rod construct may be more stable than traditional rod-to-rod connectors, especially in axial rotation. Axial stiffness and ultimate strength of 4-rod, dual-screw construct were significantly greater than rod-to-rod. In this study, 4-rod construct was found to have potential biomechanical benefits of increased strength, stiffness, stability.

References

Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M, Prosdocimo L, La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M . Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J. 2016; 26(3):764-770. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4859-8. View

Elder B, Lo S, Holmes C, Goodwin C, Kosztowski T, Lina I . The biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cement. Spine J. 2015; 15(6):1432-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.016. View

Sansur C, Caffes N, Ibrahimi D, Pratt N, Lewis E, Murgatroyd A . Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 25(4):467-476. DOI: 10.3171/2016.2.SPINE151046. View

Hallager D, Gehrchen M, Dahl B, Harris J, Gudipally M, Jenkins S . Use of Supplemental Short Pre-Contoured Accessory Rods and Cobalt Chrome Alloy Posterior Rods Reduces Primary Rod Strain and Range of Motion Across the Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Level: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(7):E388-95. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001282. View

Halvorson T, Kelley L, Thomas K, Whitecloud 3rd T, Cook S . Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(21):2415-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199411000-00008. View

Jager Z, Inceoglu S, Palmer D, Akpolat Y, Cheng W . Preventing Instrumentation Failure in Three-Column Spinal Osteotomy: Biomechanical Analysis of Rod Configuration. Spine Deform. 2016; 4(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.06.005. View

Calvert G, Lawrence B, Abtahi A, Bachus K, Brodke D . Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 22(2):166-72. DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE14371. View

Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C . Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (203):7-17. View

Stanford R, Loefler A, Stanford P, Walsh W . Multiaxial pedicle screw designs: static and dynamic mechanical testing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(4):367-75. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000092369.50397.85. View

10.

Ueno M, Imura T, Inoue G, Takaso M . Posterior corrective fusion using a double-trajectory technique (cortical bone trajectory combined with traditional trajectory) for degenerative lumbar scoliosis with osteoporosis: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(5):600-7. DOI: 10.3171/2013.7.SPINE13191. View

11.

Shen F, Qureshi R, Tyger R, Lehman R, Singla A, Shimer A . Use of the "dual construct" for the management of complex spinal reconstructions. Spine J. 2017; 18(3):482-490. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.235. View

12.

Bartanusz V, Harris J, Moldavsky M, Cai Y, Bucklen B . Short Segment Spinal Instrumentation With Index Vertebra Pedicle Screw Placement for Pathologies Involving the Anterior and Middle Vertebral Column Is as Effective as Long Segment Stabilization With Cage Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40(22):1729-36. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001130. View

13.

Goel V, Panjabi M, Patwardhan A, Dooris A, Serhan H . Test protocols for evaluation of spinal implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88 Suppl 2:103-9. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.E.01363. View

14.

Lee G, Son J, Ahn M, Kim H, Yeom J . The comparison of pedicle screw and cortical screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. Spine J. 2015; 15(7):1519-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.038. View

15.

Mohi Eldin M, Ali A . Lumbar transpedicular implant failure: a clinical and surgical challenge and its radiological assessment. Asian Spine J. 2014; 8(3):281-97. PMC: 4068848. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.281. View

16.

Scheer J, Tang J, Deviren V, Buckley J, Pekmezci M, McClellan R . Biomechanical analysis of revision strategies for rod fracture in pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Neurosurgery. 2011; 69(1):164-72. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31820f362a. View

17.

Santoni B, Hynes R, McGilvray K, Rodriguez-Canessa G, LYONS A, Henson M . Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. Spine J. 2008; 9(5):366-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008. View

18.

Perez-Orribo L, Kalb S, Reyes P, Chang S, Crawford N . Biomechanics of lumbar cortical screw-rod fixation versus pedicle screw-rod fixation with and without interbody support. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012; 38(8):635-41. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318279a95e. View

19.

Rodriguez A, Neal M, Liu A, Somasundaram A, Hsu W, Branch Jr C . Novel placement of cortical bone trajectory screws in previously instrumented pedicles for adjacent-segment lumbar disease using CT image-guided navigation. Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 36(3):E9. DOI: 10.3171/2014.1.FOCUS13521. View

20.

Shen F, Harper M, Foster W, Marks I, Arlet V . A novel "four-rod technique" for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction: theory and technical considerations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(12):1395-401. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000219527.64180.95. View