» Articles » PMID: 36644028

Comparing Electronic Health Record Domains' Utility to Identify Transgender Patients

Overview
Date 2023 Jan 16
PMID 36644028
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Earlier literature has reported on the utility of diagnostic codes and demographic information for identifying transgender patients. We aim to assess which method identifies the most transgender patients utilizing readily available tools from within the electronic health record (EHR).

Methods: A de-identified patient database from a single EHR that allows for searching any discrete data point in the EHR was used to query (ICD-10) diagnostic codes and demographic data specific to transgender patients from January 2011 to April 2019.

Results: Demographic data and ICD-10 codes yielded 1494 individual EHRs with transgender-specific data domains. ICD-10 diagnostic codes alone identified 942 (63.05%) unique EHRs. Demographics alone identified 218 (14.59%) unique EHRs. A total of 334 (22.36%) unique EHRs had both ICD-10 and demographic identifiers. Of those identified by transgender-specific demographic data (552), 294 (53.26%) were trans masculine, 215 (38.95%) were trans feminine, and 43 (7.79%) were nonbinary. Of the 552 demographic-identified transgender patients, 141 (25.86%) were identified by a two-part gender identity demographic question.

Conclusions: ICD-10 diagnostic codes, not demographic data, identified the most transgender patient records, but neither diagnostic codes alone nor demographic data captured the full population. Only 26.36% of the charts identified as transgender patients had both ICD-10 codes and demographic data. We recommend that when identifying transgender populations through EHR domains, a combination of diagnostic codes and demographic data be used. Furthermore, research is needed to optimize disclosure and collection of demographic information for gender minority populations.

Citing Articles

Health-Outcomes and Epidemiologic Research of Transgender Patients Requires Simple, Meaningful Diagnostic Codes: A Retrospective Review of California Emergency Department Visits.

Sterling J, Golos A, Sandhu S, Garcia M J Surg Res (Houst). 2024; 7(1):134-140.

PMID: 39524192 PMC: 11548847. DOI: 10.26502/jsr.10020351.


Impact of sex used for assignment of reference intervals in a population of patients taking gender-affirming hormones.

Krasowski M, Hines N, Imborek K, Greene D J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2024; 36:100350.

PMID: 38737625 PMC: 11087993. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcte.2024.100350.


Characteristics of a transgender and gender-diverse patient population in Utah: Use of electronic health records to advance clinical and health equity research.

Ho T, Zenger B, Mark B, Hiatt L, Sullivan E, Steinberg B PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302895.

PMID: 38713697 PMC: 11075904. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302895.


Re: "Determining the Sex Assigned at Birth of Transgender and Nonbinary Populations in Administrative Claims Databases Utilizing Diagnostic and Procedure Codes" by Haley et al.

Boskey E, Jolly D Transgend Health. 2024; 9(2):192-193.

PMID: 38585243 PMC: 10998010. DOI: 10.1089/trgh.2023.0083.


Patterns of gender identity data within electronic health record databases can be used as a tool for identifying and estimating the prevalence of gender-expansive people.

Hines N, Greene D, Imborek K, Krasowski M JAMIA Open. 2023; 6(2):ooad042.

PMID: 37359949 PMC: 10290553. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad042.


References
1.
Grasso C, McDowell M, Goldhammer H, Keuroghlian A . Planning and implementing sexual orientation and gender identity data collection in electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018; 26(1):66-70. PMC: 6657380. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy137. View

2.
Cahill S, Baker K, Deutsch M, Keatley J, Makadon H . Inclusion of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in Stage 3 Meaningful Use Guidelines: A Huge Step Forward for LGBT Health. LGBT Health. 2015; 3(2):100-2. DOI: 10.1089/lgbt.2015.0136. View

3.
. Improved Patient Engagement for LGBT Populations: Addressing Factors related to Sexual Orientation/Gender Identity for Effective Health Information Management. J AHIMA. 2018; 88(3):34-9. View

4.
Deutsch M, Buchholz D . Electronic health records and transgender patients--practical recommendations for the collection of gender identity data. J Gen Intern Med. 2015; 30(6):843-7. PMC: 4441683. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3148-7. View

5.
Murphy S, Mendis M, Berkowitz D, Kohane I, Chueh H . Integration of clinical and genetic data in the i2b2 architecture. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007; :1040. PMC: 1839291. View