» Articles » PMID: 36643642

Differences in Histomorphology and Expression of Key Lipid Regulated Genes of Four Adipose Tissues from Tibetan Pigs

Overview
Journal PeerJ
Date 2023 Jan 16
PMID 36643642
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Tibetan pigs, an indigenous pig breed in China, have high overall fat deposition and flavorful and tasty meat. They are thus good models for studying adipogenesis. Few studies have been conducted focusing on expression of lipid regulated genes in different adipose tissues of Tibetan pigs. Therefore, we compared the difference of histomorphology and expression level of lipid regulated genes through qPCR and western blot in subcutaneous fat, perirenal fat, omental adipose tissue, and inguinal fat of Tibetan pigs. Our results showed that the area of subcutaneous adipocytes in Tibetan pigs was smaller, while the other three adipose tissues (perirenal fat, greater omentum fat, inguinal fat) had cell areas of similar size. The gene expression of , , , and in subcutaneous fat was significantly higher than that in perirenal fat. Furthermore, the protein expression of FABP4 was significantly lower in subcutaneous fat than in perirenal fat ( < 0.05), and the expression of FASN was higher in greater omentum fat than in subcutaneous fat ( = 0.084). The difference in adipocyte cell size and expression of lipid-regulated genes in adipose tissues from the various parts of the pig body is likely due to the different cellular lipid metabolic processes. Specially, FABP4 and FASN may be involved in the regulation of fat deposition in different adipose tissues of Tibetan pigs.

Citing Articles

Identification of potential tissue-specific biomarkers involved in pig fat deposition through integrated bioinformatics analysis and machine learning.

Yang Y, Li M, Zhu Y, Wang X, Chen Q, Lu S Heliyon. 2024; 10(10):e31311.

PMID: 38807889 PMC: 11130688. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31311.

References
1.
Furuhashi M, Hotamisligil G . Fatty acid-binding proteins: role in metabolic diseases and potential as drug targets. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2008; 7(6):489-503. PMC: 2821027. DOI: 10.1038/nrd2589. View

2.
Lafontan M, Berlan M . Do regional differences in adipocyte biology provide new pathophysiological insights?. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2003; 24(6):276-83. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-6147(03)00132-9. View

3.
Merlotti C, Ceriani V, Morabito A, Pontiroli A . Subcutaneous fat loss is greater than visceral fat loss with diet and exercise, weight-loss promoting drugs and bariatric surgery: a critical review and meta-analysis. Int J Obes (Lond). 2017; 41(5):672-682. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2017.31. View

4.
Huang Z, Li Q, Li M, Li C . Transcriptome analysis reveals the long intergenic noncoding RNAs contributed to skeletal muscle differences between Yorkshire and Tibetan pig. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):2622. PMC: 7846844. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82126-2. View

5.
Zhou C, Zhang J, Ma J, Jiang A, Tang G, Mai M . Gene expression profiling reveals distinct features of various porcine adipose tissues. Lipids Health Dis. 2013; 12:75. PMC: 3679871. DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-12-75. View