» Articles » PMID: 36643150

Evaluation of Difficulty Index of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extractions

Overview
Date 2023 Jan 16
PMID 36643150
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

When compared to other teeth, third molars have a greater rate of impaction. Third molars that have been impacted are commonly encountered in dental practice, and it is the reason for complications in third molar surgery. The most commonly performed surgical procedure by dental practitioners is the third molar extraction. Despite a well-planned surgical approach, there are complications in lower third molar extractions. This study analyzes the expected difficulty during surgical removal of lower third molars that are impacted. This study analyzes the expected difficulty during the removal of impacted lower third molars by surgery. With the data from our dental institution database, the difficulty index by Pederson was used to evaluate the difficulty level of the extraction. Using SPSS, data were analyzed and results were obtained. Among impacted left mandibular third molars (38), minimal difficulty in 20.60% of the extractions, moderate difficulty in 29.58% of the extractions, and most difficulty in 2.77% of extractions were present. Among impacted right mandibular third molars (48), minimal difficulty in 18.80% of the extractions, moderate difficulty in 25.78% of the extractions, and most difficulty in 2.47% of extractions were present. According to our study, there is moderate difficulty in impacted lower third molar surgery, and it depends on factors such as systemic status and patient's age, periodontal condition, and complexity of tooth position in the dental arch.

Citing Articles

Is Surgical Removal of Asymptomatic Third Molars in the Horizontal III-C Position Advisable? A Pilot Study of Tomographic Evaluation.

Guilherme J, Bahia M, Medeiros Y, Kadooka M, Martins M, Leite I J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2024; 15(3):e4.

PMID: 39569361 PMC: 11574970. DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2024.15304.


Comparative Evaluation of Surgical Difficulty of Impacted Maxillary and Mandibular Third Molars: An Observational Study.

Glodha N, Yadav V, Verma G, Agarwal S, Zeeshan M, Agarwal S Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71356.

PMID: 39539870 PMC: 11558016. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71356.


A 3D-Planned Inward Fragmentation Technique for the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Case Series.

Engelke W, Streit D, Acuna-Mardones P, von Marttens R, Beltran V J Clin Med. 2024; 13(20).

PMID: 39458048 PMC: 11508291. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13206098.


Estimating the Extraction Time of an Upper Third Molar: Proposal and Validation of Results.

Lima-Sanchez B, Hermida-Cabrera P, Montoya-Salazar V, Oliveros-Lopez L, Alomar-Velasco P, Serrera-Figallo M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39335754 PMC: 11431398. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14182075.


Effect of Hyaluronic Acid on Socket Healing After Lower Impacted Third Molar Tooth Extraction in 40 Dental Patients.

Alenazi A, Alqhtani N, AlGhannam S, Alghanim A, Alasmari M, Almalki S Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e945386.

PMID: 39279207 PMC: 11414415. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.945386.


References
1.
Panda S, Jayakumar N, Sankari M, Varghese S, Kumar D . Platelet rich fibrin and xenograft in treatment of intrabony defect. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014; 5(4):550-4. PMC: 4229771. DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.142830. View

2.
Osunde O, Saheeb B . Effect of age, sex and level of surgical difficulty on inflammatory complications after third molar surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2015; 14(1):7-12. PMC: 4339341. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0586-4. View

3.
Chiapasco M, De Cicco L, Marrone G . Side effects and complications associated with third molar surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 76(4):412-20. DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(93)90005-o. View

4.
Muthukrishnan A, Warnakulasuriya S . Oral health consequences of smokeless tobacco use. Indian J Med Res. 2018; 148(1):35-40. PMC: 6172921. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1793_17. View

5.
Kamisetty S, Verma J, Arun , Sundari S, Chandrasekhar S, Kumar A . SBS vs Inhouse Recycling Methods-An Invitro Evaluation. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(9):ZC04-8. PMC: 4606331. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/13865.6432. View