» Articles » PMID: 36643036

Efficacy and Economic Evaluation of Nonbiological Artificial Liver Therapy in Acute-on-chronic Hepatitis B Liver Failure

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2023 Jan 16
PMID 36643036
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Nonbiological artificial liver (NBAL) is frequently used as a first-line treatment for hepatitis B virus-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure (HBV-ACLF). This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy and cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of comprehensive medical treatment, plasma exchange (PE), and double plasma molecular adsorption system (DPMAS) plus half-dose PE (DPMAS+PE) in patients with HBV-ACLF.

Methods: A total of 186 patients with HBV-ACLF randomly received comprehensive medical treatment, PE, or DPMAS+PE and were prospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into four subgroups based on the pretreatment prothrombin activity (PTA): Group I (PTA>40%), group II (PTA 30-40%), group III (PTA 20-30%), and group IV (PTA<20%). The main outcome measures were 28 day effectiveness; 90 day liver transplantation-free survival; change of biochemical parameters; and CER.

Results: DPMAS+PE treatment was associated with significantly higher 28 day effectiveness and 90 day liver transplantation-free survival compared with PE treatment in patients with group I liver failure. Clearance of serum total bilirubin (TBIL), AST, and creatinine (Cr) were significantly higher in the DPMAS+PE group than in the PE group. For subjects with group I liver failure, DPMAS+PE treatment had advantages of lower CER values and better cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: Compared with comprehensive medical treatment and PE alone, DPMAS with half-dose sequential PE treatment more effectively improved TBIL, AST, and Cr in HBV-ACLF patients, improved 28 day effectiveness and 90 day survival rates in patients with group I liver failure, and was more cost effective. DPMAS+PE is a viable NBAL approach for treatment of HBV-ACLF.

Citing Articles

Association between volume of processed plasma and total bilirubin reduction during plasma adsorption for severe liver disease.

Ma Y, Xu Y, Du L, Bai L, Tang H Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):175.

PMID: 40089798 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02419-4.


A nomogram model based on albumin-bilirubin score for predicting 90-day prognosis in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

Ding W, Shen J, Zhang L, Shao J, Bian Z, Xue H Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11():1406275.

PMID: 39835109 PMC: 11744009. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1406275.


Efficacy and safety of artificial liver support system treatment for immune checkpoint inhibitors related liver failure in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Luo Q, Zhang Y, Li Z, Chen J, Deng Z, Lai J Heliyon. 2024; 10(20):e39095.

PMID: 39640621 PMC: 11620127. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39095.


Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Hepatology: Indications, Techniques, and Practical Application.

Agrawal D, Ariga K, Gupta S, Saigal S J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024; 15(1):102410.

PMID: 39430641 PMC: 11489060. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102410.


Mixed mode of artificial liver support in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: a retrospective cohort study.

Wang X, Peng B, Zhang L, Zhao J, Zhang L, Ren H Hepatol Int. 2023; 17(5):1241-1250.

PMID: 37550499 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10573-2.


References
1.
Sarin S, Choudhury A, Sharma M, Maiwall R, Al Mahtab M, Rahman S . Acute-on-chronic liver failure: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific association for the study of the liver (APASL): an update. Hepatol Int. 2019; 13(4):353-390. PMC: 6728300. DOI: 10.1007/s12072-019-09946-3. View

2.
Zhong S, Wang N, Zhao J, Zhang L, Luo L, Zeng W . [Plasma exchange combined with double plasma absorption therapy improve the prognosis of acute-on-chronic liver failure]. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2018; 26(10):744-749. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2018.10.003. View

3.
Keklik M, Sivgin S, Kaynar L, Pala C, Solmaz M, Cetin M . Treatment with plasma exchange may serve benefical effect in patients with severe hyperbilirubinemia: a single center experience. Transfus Apher Sci. 2013; 48(3):323-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.04.009. View

4.
Michalopoulos G, Bhushan B . Liver regeneration: biological and pathological mechanisms and implications. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18(1):40-55. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-020-0342-4. View

5.
Winters J . Plasma exchange: concepts, mechanisms, and an overview of the American Society for Apheresis guidelines. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2012; 2012:7-12. DOI: 10.1182/asheducation-2012.1.7. View