» Articles » PMID: 36639757

Transcriptomic Profiling Reveals Differences in the Adaptation of Two Tetragenococcus Halophilus Strains to a Lupine Moromi Model Medium

Overview
Journal BMC Microbiol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Jan 13
PMID 36639757
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tetragenococcus (T.) halophilus is a common member of the microbial consortia of food fermented under high salt conditions. These comprises salty condiments based on soy or lupine beans, fish sauce, shrimp paste and brined anchovies. Within these fermentations this lactic acid bacterium (LAB) is responsible for the formation of lactic and other short chain acids that contribute to the flavor and lower the pH of the product. In this study, we investigated the transcriptomic profile of the two T. halophilus strains TMW 2.2254 and TMW 2.2256 in a lupine moromi model medium supplied with galactose. To get further insights into which genomic trait is important, we used a setup with two strains. That way we can determine if strain dependent pathways contribute to the overall fitness. These strains differ in the ability to utilize L-arginine, L-aspartate, L-arabinose, D-sorbitol, glycerol, D-lactose or D-melibiose. The lupine moromi model medium is an adapted version of the regular MRS medium supplied with lupine peptone instead of casein peptone and meat extract, to simulate the amino acid availabilities in lupine moromi.

Results: The transcriptomic profiles of the T. halophilus strains TMW 2.2254 and TMW 2.2256 in a lupine peptone-based model media supplied with galactose, used as simulation media for a lupine seasoning sauce fermentation, were compared to the determine potentially important traits. Both strains, have a great overlap in their response to the culture conditions but some strain specific features such as the utilization of glycerol, sorbitol and arginine contribute to the overall fitness of the strain TMW 2.2256. Interestingly, although both strains have two non-identical copies of the tagatose-6P pathway and the Leloir pathway increased under the same conditions, TMW 2.2256 prefers the degradation via the tagatose-6P pathway while TMW 2.2254 does not. Furthermore, TMW 2.2256 shows an increase in pathways required for balancing out the intracellular NADH/NADH ratios.

Conclusions: Our study reveals for the first time, that both versions of tagatose-6P pathways encoded in both strains are simultaneously active together with the Leloir pathway and contribute to the degradation of galactose. These findings will help to understand the strain dependent features that might be required for a starter strain in lupine moromi.

Citing Articles

Correlation between physicochemical properties, flavor characteristics and microbial community structure in Dushan shrimp sour paste.

Song X, Liao D, Zhou Y, Huang Q, Lei S, Li X Food Chem X. 2024; 23:101543.

PMID: 39022783 PMC: 11252767. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101543.

References
1.
Lin J, Luo X, Ganzle M, Luo L . Characterization of the two nonidentical ArgR regulators of Tetragenococcus halophilus and their regulatory effects on arginine metabolism. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 104(20):8775-8787. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10868-6. View

2.
Robinson M, McCarthy D, Smyth G . edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(1):139-40. PMC: 2796818. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. View

3.
Chun B, Han D, Kim K, Jeong S, Park D, Jeon C . Genomic and metabolic features of Tetragenococcus halophilus as revealed by pan-genome and transcriptome analyses. Food Microbiol. 2019; 83:36-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.04.009. View

4.
Kilstrup M, Hammer K, Jensen P, Martinussen J . Nucleotide metabolism and its control in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005; 29(3):555-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.04.006. View

5.
Neves A, Pool W, Solopova A, Kok J, Santos H, Kuipers O . Towards enhanced galactose utilization by Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010; 76(21):7048-60. PMC: 2976262. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01195-10. View