» Articles » PMID: 36635735

Randomized Controlled Trial for Selective Preventive Transdiagnostic Intervention for Adolescents at Risk for Emotional Disorders

Abstract

Significant evidence does exist on the effectiveness of transdiagnostic interventions to improve emotional problems in clinical populations, and their application as universal and indicated prevention programs. However, no randomized controlled trials (RCT) studying selective transdiagnostic prevention intervention have been published. This is the first known RCT to evaluate the efficacy/effectiveness of an evidence-based selective prevention transdiagnostic program for emotional problems in adolescents. The impact of three different interventions was evaluated: (1) PROCARE (Preventive transdiagnostic intervention for Adolescents at Risk for Emotional disorders), which is a group-based, online-delivered, abbreviated version of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Adolescents (UP-A), along with adding a booster session, to reduce risk of onset of anxiety and depression, (2) PROCARE + , which includes the PROCARE protocol along with personalized add-on modules tailored to match adolescents' risk factors, and (3) an active control condition (ACC) based on emotional psychoeducation. In total, 286 adolescents (53.3% girls) evidencing high risk and low protective factors were randomized and allocated to PROCARE, PROCARE + or ACC. Self- and parent-reported measures were taken at baseline, as well as after the intervention, a 6-month follow-up was carried out, together with a 1-month follow-up after the booster session. Differences between conditions were significant on most of the outcome measures, with superior effect sizes for PROCARE +. Interventions were excellent in terms of acceptability, with good satisfaction rates. Tailored selective transdiagnostic interventions focused on mitigating risk factors and promoting protective factors in vulnerable adolescents are promising.

Citing Articles

The efficacy of personalized psychological interventions in adolescents: a scoping review and meta-analysis.

Li W, Gleeson J, Fraser M, Ciarrochi J, Hofmann S, Hayes S Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1470817.

PMID: 39309145 PMC: 11413809. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1470817.

References
1.
Stone L, Otten R, Engels R, Vermulst A, Janssens J . Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010; 13(3):254-74. PMC: 2919684. DOI: 10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2. View

2.
Furukawa T, Noma H, Caldwell D, Honyashiki M, Shinohara K, Imai H . Waiting list may be a nocebo condition in psychotherapy trials: a contribution from network meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2014; 130(3):181-92. DOI: 10.1111/acps.12275. View

3.
Anniko M, Boersma K, Tillfors M . Sources of stress and worry in the development of stress-related mental health problems: A longitudinal investigation from early- to mid-adolescence. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2018; 32(2):155-167. DOI: 10.1080/10615806.2018.1549657. View

4.
Pachankis J . A transdiagnostic minority stress treatment approach for gay and bisexual men's syndemic health conditions. Arch Sex Behav. 2015; 44(7):1843-60. PMC: 4560958. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-015-0480-x. View

5.
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A . Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2010; 38(2):65-76. PMC: 3068522. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7. View