» Articles » PMID: 36634462

Robustness of Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging Against Uncertainty in Atrial Morphology and Location

Overview
Date 2023 Jan 12
PMID 36634462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Electrocardiographic Imaging is a non-invasive technique that requires cardiac Imaging for the reconstruction of cardiac electrical activity. In this study, we explored imageless ECGI by quantifying the errors of using heart meshes with either an inaccurate location inside the thorax or an inaccurate geometry.

Methods: Multiple‑lead body surface recordings of 25 atrial fibrillation (AF) patients were recorded. Cardiac atrial meshes were obtained by segmentation of medical images obtained for each patient. ECGI was computed with each patient's segmented atrial mesh and compared with the ECGI obtained under errors in the atrial mesh used for ECGI estimation. We modeled both the uncertainty in the location of the atria inside the thorax by artificially translating the atria inside the thorax and the geometry of the atrial mesh by using an atrial mesh in a reference database. ECGI signals obtained with the actual meshes and the translated or estimated meshes were compared in terms of their correlation coefficients, relative difference measurement star, and errors in the dominant frequency (DF) estimation in epicardial nodes.

Results: CC between ECGI signals obtained after translating the actual atrial meshes from the original position by 1 cm was above 0.97. CC between ECGIs obtained with patient specific atrial geometry and estimated atrial geometries was 0.93 ± 0.11. Mean errors in DF estimation using an estimated atrial mesh were 7.6 ± 5.9%.

Conclusion: Imageless ECGI can provide a robust estimation of cardiac electrophysiological parameters such as activation rates even during complex arrhythmias. Furthermore, it can allow more widespread use of ECGI in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Complexity and recurrence of body surface electrocardiograms correlate with estimated reentrant atrial activity using electrocardiographic imaging in atrial fibrillation patients.

Molero R, Meste O, Peeters R, Karel J, Bonizzi P, Guillem M BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025; 25(1):23.

PMID: 39815199 PMC: 11737253. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-025-04483-4.


Systematic review of computational techniques, dataset utilization, and feature extraction in electrocardiographic imaging.

Mayorca-Torres D, Leon-Salas A, Peluffo-Ordonez D Med Biol Eng Comput. 2025; .

PMID: 39779645 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03264-z.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Arrhythm. 2024; 40(6):1217-1354.

PMID: 39669937 PMC: 11632303. DOI: 10.1002/joa3.13082.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024; 67(5):921-1072.

PMID: 38609733 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5.


2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Tzeis S, Gerstenfeld E, Kalman J, Saad E, Sepehri Shamloo A, Andrade J Europace. 2024; 26(4).

PMID: 38587017 PMC: 11000153. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euae043.