» Articles » PMID: 36630024

Reference Values of EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23, and EQ-5D-5L for Women with Non-metastatic Breast Cancer at Diagnosis and 2 Years After

Abstract

Purpose: To obtain reference norms of EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BR23, and EQ-5D-5L, based on a population of Spanish non-metastatic breast cancer patients at diagnosis and 2 years after, according to relevant demographic and clinical characteristics.

Methods: Multicentric prospective cohort study including consecutive women aged ≥ 18 years with a diagnosis of incident non-metastatic breast cancer from April 2013 to May 2015. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires were administered between diagnosis and beginning the therapy, and 2 years after. HRQoL differences according to age, comorbidity and stage were tested with ANOVA or Chi Square test and multivariate linear regression models.

Results: 1276 patients were included, with a mean age of 58 years. Multivariate models of EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score and EQ-5D-5L index at diagnosis and at 2-year follow-up show the independent association of comorbidity and tumor stage with HRQoL. The standardized multivariate regression coefficient of EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score was lower (poorer HRQoL) for women with stage II and III than for those with stage 0 at diagnosis (- 0.11 and - 0.07, p < 0.05) and follow-up (- 0.15 and - 0.10, p < 0.01). The EQ-5D-5L index indicated poorer HRQoL for women with Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 2 than comorbidity 0 both at diagnosis (- 0.13, p < 0.001) and follow-up (- 0.18, p < 0.001). Therefore, we provided the reference norms at diagnosis and at the 2-year follow-up, stratified by age, comorbidity index, and tumor stage.

Conclusion: These HRQoL reference norms can be useful to interpret the scores of women with non-metastatic breast cancer, comparing them with country-specific reference values for this population.

Citing Articles

Effects of Symptom Burden on Quality of Life in Patients with Lung Cancer.

Chiou L, Lin Y, Lang H Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(10):6144-6154.

PMID: 39451762 PMC: 11506357. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31100458.


Clinical Pharmacist-Led Interventions for Improving Breast Cancer Management-A Scoping Review.

Staynova R, Gavazova E, Kafalova D Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(8):4178-4191.

PMID: 39195295 PMC: 11352950. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080312.


Patient preferences for breast cancer screening: a systematic review update to inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Pillay J, Guitard S, Rahman S, Saba S, Rahman A, Bialy L Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):140.

PMID: 38807191 PMC: 11134964. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02539-8.

References
1.
Ramos-Goni J, Craig B, Oppe M, Ramallo-Farina Y, Pinto-Prades J, Luo N . Handling Data Quality Issues to Estimate the Spanish EQ-5D-5L Value Set Using a Hybrid Interval Regression Approach. Value Health. 2018; 21(5):596-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.10.023. View

2.
Smyth E, Shen W, Bowman L, Peterson P, John W, Melemed A . Patient-reported pain and other quality of life domains as prognostic factors for survival in a phase III clinical trial of patients with advanced breast cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016; 14:52. PMC: 4807577. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-016-0449-z. View

3.
Golicki D, Niewada M . EQ-5D-5L Polish population norms. Arch Med Sci. 2017; 13(1):191-200. PMC: 5206353. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2015.52126. View

4.
Ho P, Gernaat S, Hartman M, Verkooijen H . Health-related quality of life in Asian patients with breast cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(4):e020512. PMC: 5914715. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020512. View

5.
Moro-Valdezate D, Peiro S, Buch-Villa E, Caballero-Garate A, Morales-Monsalve M, Martinez-Agullo A . Evolution of Health-Related Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients during the First Year of Follow-Up. J Breast Cancer. 2013; 16(1):104-11. PMC: 3625756. DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.1.104. View