Moroccans' Views on Resuscitation According to Presumed Degree of Disability: A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview

Journal Cureus

Specialty Biomedical Engineering

Date 2023 Jan 11

PMID 36628402

Authors

Sabah Benhamza

Laila Lahlou

Mohammad Khalayla

Mohamed Lazraq

Youssef Miloudi

Abdelhak Bensaid

Najib El Harrar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: According to the World Health Organization (WHO), disability is a public health problem that can be difficult to manage medically and financially. Disability can either be innate or develop after resuscitation. Therefore, the decision regarding whether to resuscitate a patient or not raises certain ethical questions, especially in the context of a Muslim country such as Morocco.

Aim: The main aim of this study is to survey the public's opinions regarding their willingness to be resuscitated or have their relatives be resuscitated based on their foreseeable degree of disability.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted over a 10-month period and employed a self-administered questionnaire. The participants included were all adult (i.e., over 18 years of age) Moroccan nationals, and they were selected regardless of their religious identity. Moreover, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to measure the participants' foreseeable degree of handicap. The participants were divided into two groups: healthcare workers and non-healthcare workers.

Results: In total, 1083 questionnaires were retained. The average age of the participants was 30 (± 8) years, with the male-to-female sex ratio being 0.78. Moreover, 39.6% of the participants were healthcare workers. It was found that compared to the non healthcare workers, the healthcare professionals were more willing to be resuscitated themselves and have resuscitation performed on their relatives, but only when the degree of foreseeable disability was estimated to be absent or insignificant, whereas they were less willing to be resuscitated and have resuscitation performed on their relatives when the degree of foreseeable disability was estimated to be mild or higher.

Conclusion: In conclusion, there should be a pre-established procedure, along with a legislative and multidisciplinary framework, within the hospital structures in order to help in the decision-making process regarding whether to resuscitate a patient or not.

References

Christensen M, Mayer S, Ferran J . Quality of life after intracerebral hemorrhage: results of the Factor Seven for Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke (FAST) trial. Stroke. 2009; 40(5):1677-82. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.538967. View

Albrecht G, Devlieger P . The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 48(8):977-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00411-0. View

Sturm J, Donnan G, Dewey H, Macdonell R, Gilligan A, Srikanth V . Quality of life after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2004; 35(10):2340-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000141977.18520.3b. View

Gallo J, Straton J, Klag M, Meoni L, Sulmasy D, Wang N . Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others?. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003; 51(7):961-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51309.x. View

Carmel S . Life-sustaining treatments: what doctors do, what they want for themselves and what elderly persons want. Soc Sci Med. 1999; 49(10):1401-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00221-x. View

Pandharipande P, Girard T, Wesley Ely E . Long-term cognitive impairment after critical illness. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(2):185-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1313886. View

Klein A, Kuehner C, Schwarz S . Attitudes in the general population towards hemi-craniectomy for middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. A population-based survey. Neurocrit Care. 2012; 16(3):456-61. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-012-9677-1. View

Bruno M, Bernheim J, Ledoux D, Pellas F, Demertzi A, Laureys S . A survey on self-assessed well-being in a cohort of chronic locked-in syndrome patients: happy majority, miserable minority. BMJ Open. 2011; 1(1):e000039. PMC: 3191401. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000039. View

van Swieten J, Koudstaal P, Visser M, Schouten H, van Gijn J . Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988; 19(5):604-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.19.5.604. View

10.

Kirk P, Kirk I, Kristjanson L . What do patients receiving palliative care for cancer and their families want to be told? A Canadian and Australian qualitative study. BMJ. 2004; 328(7452):1343. PMC: 420285. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38103.423576.55. View

11.

Gulec M, Altintas M, Inanc L, Bezgin C, Kaymak Koca E, Gulec H . Effects of childhood trauma on somatization in major depressive disorder: The role of alexithymia. J Affect Disord. 2012; 146(1):137-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.06.033. View

12.

Fried T, Bradley E, Towle V, Allore H . Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346(14):1061-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012528. View

13.

Sprung C, Carmel S, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Cohen S, Maia P . Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study. Intensive Care Med. 2006; 33(1):104-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-006-0405-1. View

14.

Patel M, Tilling K, Lawrence E, Rudd A, Wolfe C, McKevitt C . Relationships between long-term stroke disability, handicap and health-related quality of life. Age Ageing. 2006; 35(3):273-9. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afj074. View

15.

Azoulay E, Lautrette A, Peigne V, Pochard F . [Meeting the needs of families of patients in intensive care units]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2011; 195(2):367-75. View

16.

Ubel P, Loewenstein G, Schwarz N, Smith D . Misimagining the unimaginable: the disability paradox and health care decision making. Health Psychol. 2005; 24(4S):S57-62. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S57. View